What are some important qualities of a good supervisor (boss)? Use specific details and examples to explain why these qualities are important.

Essay topics:

What are some important qualities of a good supervisor (boss)? Use specific details and examples to explain why these qualities are important.

Subordinates have significant responsibilities towards their supervisors. On the other hand, bosses should meet certain qualities in order to lead the team in the finest way. In the following paragraphs, I will discuss two main qualities of an effective supervisor, namely knowledge and communication. I will also demonstrate examples to ascertain my arguments.

The first crucial characteristic of a decent supervisor is knowledge; the knowledge of the field, and awareness of available resources. Supervisors cannot lead their teams and employees when they lack in perceiving the basic demands, resources, and skills of their subordinates. In order to devise a clear roadmap, they need to be fully aware of their current situation and have a clear perspective of the objectives. It is only then that major plans can be set up and followed. For example, I was once enrolled in an undergraduate course named, System Analysis and Design. Almost fifty percent of the overall grade was devoted to a group project. The goal was to build a simple banking website. The group included me and two of my friends, Ali, and Reza. Even though Ali did not have any prior knowledge of back-end and front-end, he was selected as the group leader by the course instructor. The project turned out to be a disaster. We chose defective frameworks for designing the website. Moreover, we also could not manage our time appropriately and were not able to deliver the project with all the required features. In the end, we regretfully blamed Ali for assuming and retaining the management of the group.

The second vital characteristic of a great supervisor is communication. Communication is needed at all times. It is a fundamental aspect of having a coordinated team. Supervisors need to be aware of all the ongoing tasks and constantly revise their schedules. The employees should be informed to invest an adequate amount of their weekly time for communication purposes. For instance, I once registered in a math group competition with three of my friends. The whole duration of the contest was two hours and we were given ten questions to work on. I was elected as the group leader and started distributing questions according to members' expertise. I asked all the members to inform me of their progress every ten minutes and we kept an efficacious level of communication through the whole exam. At some points, I felt the need to change the configuration of task assignments and did so. After nearly 90 minutes, we solved all the problems and ended up being the champions.

In conclusion, I addressed wisdom and communication as two important qualities of an exceptional supervisor through the usage of real scenarios. I believe these two characteristics are crucial for each and every current or prospective boss.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-20 bahram1993 73 view
2019-04-01 edsonsimoes 60 view
2019-01-10 H_Ata 73 view
2018-12-12 Md Rajeun Islam 76 view
2018-09-19 sepehrmousavi 73 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
Independent TOEFL Writing

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ining the management of the group. The second vital characteristic of a gre...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, then, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2352.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 459.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12418300654 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14685501632 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544662309368 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 737.1 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6528031807 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.4 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86666666667 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.88709677419 266% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0922590696874 0.236089414692 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0230794418192 0.076458572812 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398307527268 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0886849539539 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673605202825 0.0645574589148 104% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.82 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 86.8835125448 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.