What are some important qualities of a good supervisor (boss)? Use specific details and examples to explain why these qualities are important.
People today spend an enormous amount of time at their workplace, and how much they enjoy that time depends largely on the attitude and attributes of their supervisor. I am of the opinion that there are two main characteristics of a good boss, which are his experience and his professionalism. I will explore these two factors in the following essay.
First of all, the amount of experience that our boss has is very important, because we are more likely to learn from a supervisor who is very experienced in their field. Young people who are just starting out in their careers absorb new information like sponges, but even older workers can learn from those who have been around for a long time. My own experience is a compelling example of this. When I began teaching ten years ago, my supervisor, Simon, had been working in education for more than ten years. I was just out of college and knew very little about creating effective lesson plans, engaging students or even how to complete my paperwork. Simon took the time to show me what he had learned over previous decade, and therefore I was soon able to keep up with my officemates. In contrast, when I moved to a new school earlier this year, my supervisor actually had less experience teaching than I did. Moreover, when I struggled with certain aspects of my job, he had very little to suggest that I did not already know. As a result, my professional development stagnated.
Secondly, I feel that the professionalism is important for a boss, as it is essential to the maintenance of a good office environment. My sister once told me that her first job following her graduation was difficult because of how toxic the office was. Workers were prone to gossiping, shirking their duties and arriving late each day. This was seen as acceptable because most of the supervisors in the firm behaved in the exact same way. My sister was miserable, though, because she prides herself on her diligence and her ability to complete her tasks with care and enthusiasm. This situation is a stark contrast to my experience with Simon, who I mentioned above. He arrived early to the office each day, and never engaged in idle gossip about his officemates. The people he supervised tried to do the same things.
In conclusion, I believe that experience and professionalism are the hallmarks of a good supervisor. This is because we can learn a lot from a knowledgeable boss, and because employees will strive to emulate a supervisor who acts with professionalism and dignity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... two factors in the following essay. First of all, the amount of experience t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... professional development stagnated. Secondly, I feel that the professionalis...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 52, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...econdly, I feel that the professionalism is important for a boss, as it is essent...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ervised tried to do the same things. In conclusion, I believe that experience...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, i feel, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2092.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 435.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8091954023 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89916867734 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 666.0 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0412998709 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0909090909 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7727272727 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0904440334539 0.236089414692 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0303783733851 0.076458572812 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355617445862 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0645551541987 0.150856017488 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0197289982405 0.0645574589148 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.