What is your approach to problem-solving, how does it works for you? Use specific details to support your response.
According to each person's intellectual orientation and distinctive characteristics, each finds different methods to tackle to a problem, from daily life matters to academic subjects. Today, problem-solving ability becomes a critical skill for every student due to its increasing importance in real-life situations and a requirement for the employment process of almost all companies. For the most effectual practice of problem-solving attainment, both academic knowledge and practical experience have equal significance, the former allows one to get erudition of the problem, the latter enhances one's versatility to approach it.
Today, materials for the guidance of best practice for problem-solving skill are made available both online and offline, enabling students to get cognition over the subject from the academic perspective. Instruction from scholar articles provides a valuable source of information to get the first approach to problem-solving. For example, in various published books by prestigious authors, students can find necessary information about how to deal with a problem, from its definition, classification, and the common methods applied in a variety of contexts. Often, those academic materials gain the merit for comprehensive knowledge and detailed explanation, allowing learners to view the subject from different angles. In addition to those articles or textbooks, one can find a rich source of information available online in the format of video. Those instruction videos are conducted by credential schools and non-profit organizations which offers online course with no fee related and interactive display. For those who find no interest in learning real-life skills in textbook can gain motivation from those online courses. All in all, academic approach to problem-solving furnishes learners with rich information and becomes an exciting field to study.
Besides the knowledge provided by scholars and researchers, students can obtain problem-solving skills in a more pragmatic manner, namely practicing it daily by joining some clubs or social activities. In university, student organizations attract the attention of a majority of students for they provide students with important skills beyond what is taught in formal education. For example, in those student's clubs, regardless of their scale or number of participants, there are numerous events that require members to possess the flexibility in dealing with arising problems. The experience gained from exposure to those difficulties is a great benefit for all those joining. Furthermore, joining student organizations offers participants the opportunity to practice the knowledge they get from the lecture hall. Apparently, due to the lack of interaction and real context in the class, many issues associated with a particular situation are omitted in the case study. However, students can find the resolution by employing the methodology gained in classroom, combining with their ability to handling other problems related.
In conclusion, students can get problem-solving skills from various different channels, from academic sources to non-academic sources, while the former offers a comprehensive and objective approach, the latter provides students with other but equally important skills needed for good practicing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 597, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ion of the problem, the latter enhances ones versatility to approach it. Today, m...
^^^^
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the best'.
Suggestion: of the best
...t. Today, materials for the guidance of best practice for problem-solving skill are ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 8.0752688172 322% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2842.0 1977.66487455 144% => OK
No of words: 482.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89626556017 4.8611393121 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26476921042 2.67179642975 122% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51244813278 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 873.9 618.680645161 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.139685945 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.578947368 100.406767564 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3684210526 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73684210526 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117609849094 0.236089414692 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434580939006 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0320723341243 0.0737576698707 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.08138034233 0.150856017488 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262751742217 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 11.7677419355 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 58.1214874552 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.24 10.9000537634 158% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.01818996416 127% => OK
difficult_words: 163.0 86.8835125448 188% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 10.002688172 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.