When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mails, they will produce better work for the project.
At workplaces or schools, it is not rare to see people discussing the projects due in a short time. In order to meet the deadlines of a perticular group project, people either communicate face-to-face or by emails. Some might thinkg that to communicate a project in person is better than emails. For me, I believe that both ways are equally important for finishing a project. None of them is replaceble.
Arranging a face-to-face meeting for doing a project for colleagues or classmates is time-saving and it brings unexpected new ideas. When people meet up to finish a task, they get feedbacks instantly. Groups members are able to discuss various details of a project without wating time on waiting for replies. In contrast, to get a quick response for a complicated problem regarding a project is not practical if using emails, as replying emails involves typing and modifying formats, which could be time-consuming. Furthermore, by communicating in person, it is easier for members to think of new ideas or solutions for the project by, for example, brain-storming or mind-mapping, which can be easily done by using pens and papers. Again, because of the instant responces people get from each other, the project can be done more efficiently. On the contrarary, such benefits can hardly be obtained when people try to finish a project using emails. However, it is not to say that e-mails does not have any advantages.
E-mails is a great complement for personal meetings with regard to group projects. Communicating through emails allow people to keep in touch anytime and anywhere with internet access. For students and employees, who usually have several assignments or tasks going on at the same time, it is more convenient for them to use emails to get to know the priorities of each project. By contrast, when scheduing for a personal meeting, people might encounter problems such as time conflicts or long travelling distances. In those cases, e-mails are a more suitable way for communicating. Moreover, writing emails involves more thinking, thus making the responses more effective. Emails containing all the informations of a projects present a good source for deep-thinking and reflection. However,those texts in emails are usually contained in a face-to-face meetings, which involves more talking and quick decisions.
To conclude, each way of communicating has it's cons and pros. Groups in companies or schools usually adopt both to finish a project when aiming for the best performance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 716, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a project' or simply 'projects'?
Suggestion: a project; projects
...ails containing all the informations of a projects present a good source for deep-thinking...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 790, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , those
...or deep-thinking and reflection. However,those texts in emails are usually contained i...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 853, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'meeting'?
Suggestion: meeting
...are usually contained in a face-to-face meetings, which involves more talking and quick ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, for example, in contrast, such as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2112.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 406.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20197044335 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0574430445 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534482758621 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 640.8 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9666122727 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8260869565 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.652173913 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.60869565217 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299068377823 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916290526762 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648803500752 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202978692768 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536184970261 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.