When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success." Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position.
Considering the effect of hard working as the only parameter on the people success, although I cannot thoroughly ignore the impact of luck, I am highly inclined to take the side of the hard working as the decisive factor. To elaborate more on the topic mentioned, the following reasons and examples will be presented.
First and foremost, as the success can be considered as the journey not a definite destination, therefore, the lots of efforts should be done to complete the route. For instance, achieving particular expertise in the major requires approaching breadth of the appropriate knowledge in that discipline such as doing experiments, studying well-known references, advisement with scientists, etc. I strikingly believe that there is a causal relationship between the desirable gain on the one hand and the how much work have been done on the other hand. In other words, if you work harder, the possibility of your success increase noticeably. It is also worth noting that the effect of luck on the completion of success elements is more little than other factors and even may neglect in some factors such as doing exact experiments and studying prominence references. Thus, in this case, the hard working might be indicated as the unique characteristic.
Aside from the point I made above, the intrinsic of the success cannot be always identified as the characterized goal like the shooting goals. Although in some conditions that can be resembled as tossing the coin, the luck is only parameter to be succeed, but this is consistent only in the situations that the effect of other parameters are eliminated. For instance, for embarking on the competition such football, the coin definite which team is eligible to start. A a result, the effect of chance in the people success can regard in the limited cases.
Being one of the proliferated well-known issue on the success, the controversial debate on the effectiveness of both chance and hardworking is usually based on the fact that the statistical reports on people success by their hard working is more than their luck. For example, the successful athletes, scientists, business men, etc can be recognized by their efforts. I rarely heard that the famous prosperous people acclaimed for their luck.
Taking all of these perspectives into account, I cannot agree more about the critical role of hard working on the success achievement that categorically outweigh the possible advantages of the luck. To my best knowledge, if I strong and illegible enough, not only I do not need any chance and can overcome all possible bad lucks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 497, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'how'?
Suggestion: how
... the desirable gain on the one hand and the how much work have been done on the other h...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 468, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: A
...finite which team is eligible to start. A a result, the effect of chance in the peo...
^^^
Line 5, column 468, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'An' instead of 'A' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: An
...finite which team is eligible to start. A a result, the effect of chance in the p...
^
Line 5, column 468, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'A' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: A; A
...finite which team is eligible to start. A a result, the effect of chance in the peo...
^^^
Line 5, column 556, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uccess can regard in the limited cases. Being one of the proliferated well-known...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, for example, for instance, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2182.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11007025761 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93359344931 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52224824356 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 682.2 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 11.0 3.08781362007 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.3485394508 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.352941176 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1176470588 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64705882353 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20604553595 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647528770096 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409953717837 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116586190464 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368838809945 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.