Teachers used to convey information, but now wide sources of information are available online. Some people think there is no role for teachers to play in modern education. Others disagree.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Considering the definition of teachers as the conveyors of the information on the one hand, and the availability of wide sources of online information on the other hand, I strongly disagree that there is no role for teachers to play in modern education. Regarding the selection of appropriate information for students, the importance of information interpretation as well as the psychological impact of teacher presence in the class, I integrally tend to take the opposite direction of the statement that in the modern education the teachers should be eliminated. To elaborate more on the topic mentioned, the following reasons and examples will be presented.
First and foremost, being one of the most proliferated prominence element for all educational systems, the critical role of teacher should not be confined as the information conveyors. Although, there are the lots of online information for all the internet users, the teacher plays a crucial role to interpret them in an effective way based on the thorough recognition of students and the psychological characteristics of them. It is obvious that most of the online information is not uploaded based on the educational need of the users. In other words, the foundation and motivation for sharing of information using the world wide web, as far I am concerned, are based on the interest of users not their educational needs and the monetary or advertisement goals. Regarding this issue, one cannot gives the credit to the proportion of this online information to the educational needs of the students. As a result, not only the teacher responsibility can be considered as the selector of the suitable information, but also can be denoted as the influential interpreter of crude information. Consequently, despite the immense volume of online information, the necessity of the teacher in educational institution become crystal clear.
Another primary reason can be ascribed to the psychological impact of teachers in all educational institutes from antediluvian to modern systems. It goes without saying that the educational requirements of students cannot restricted to their knowledge but the formation of their personality can be implied as the ardor topic in the modern life. I immensely believe that the successful educational system should regard numerous psychological programs for their students. To my best knowledge, the deficiency of the perfect psychological training course based on the integral assessment of the users in the online information is capricious. It is also worth nothing that the psychological influence of the real human as the teacher in the educational system is categorically more than the virtual trainer or special character in the internet. The selection of some teacher behaviors by students particularly the young ones can be indicated as the good example for this subject.
To recapitulate, I cannot agree more about the vital role of teacher in the modern education system considering the presence of intelligent person to select, interpret and convey the appropriate information from the crude available information. Moreover, the psychological affection of student to follow their education cannot stimulate by the online trainers and to my best knowledge, the perfect teacher can play fundamental role in the topic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective way" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... plays a crucial role to interpret them in an effective way based on the thorough recognition of st...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, moreover, regarding, so, well, as a result, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 41.998997996 188% => OK
Nominalization: 40.0 8.3376753507 480% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2809.0 1615.20841683 174% => OK
No of words: 517.0 315.596192385 164% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4332688588 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76839952204 4.20363070211 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26669723549 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.433268858801 0.561755894193 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 910.8 506.74238477 180% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.4525712147 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.055555556 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7222222222 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94444444444 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26457626293 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933453625773 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837974012547 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194478762816 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750437081239 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.81 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 78.4519038076 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.5 9.78957915832 220% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.