Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Regarding the presence of human as a creature to damage the Earth or modify it in the way to make a better place to live, the numerous evidences demonstrate the critical harmful role of humans in which they have jeopardized other creatures’ life. The interference of human in the natural processes to exploit their advantages more often than not is in conjunction with depriving other living beings from their definite rights. Constructing huge dams to storage water and produce energy, exploiting fossil fuels and polluting the atmosphere and even restricting wild zones to develop the domain of metropolitan cities are few examples indicating negative effects of human activities. To elaborate more on the topic mentioned the following reasons and examples accompanying related facts and figures are presented.
First and foremost, what the excavated historical findings endorse is bringing about a confrontational issue that there is causal relation between the development of human civilization on the one hand and the extinction of other animal and plant species on the other hand. Considering the growth trend of all creatures of the Earth, the human population growth is remarkably accelerated compared to others. In spite of some common natural disasters which perish lots of living beings in different populations, human could survive themselves by manipulating the Earth ecosystem and abusing the kindness of nature, regardless of other creatures’ life. Except earth quake, during the occurrence of flood, drought, hurricane, volcano eruption, etc., the probability of human withstanding is highly anticipated in comparison of other Earth dwellers. Moreover, from antediluvian era to nowadays, the extinction of deluge types of animals is another demonstrative fact pointing out the unilateral usage of human to maintain their life. This evidently proves the human activity cannot refer to the subject that they make the Earth better place to live for all creatures.
Another primary believe that obviously reveals the negative effect of human activity on the Earth life is uncontrolled and unsupervised exploitation of Earth resources in different parts of the world. Shut those activities down absolutely catalyzes the life comfort of other creatures. For instance, the coronovirus outbreak compelling the whole world conflict, currently leads to stop human activities and take human into quarantine. A decrease in the earth vibration, the emergence of different wild animals in the cities' streets, the significant reduction in air pollution, and the relative modification in ozone layer are the few advantages of the human quarantine which strongly reinforce the contemplation that the life of the Earth is much tolerable when it comes to human activities.
To recapitulate, the manipulation of human in the life cycles of all creatures, jeopardizes the life of them. The smart of human is trended toward a think that the life of others would not to be regraded at all. The critical role of all governments to control catastrophic effects of human activities should not be neglected. In my opinion, sooner or later, if the condemns of this calamity is not rebuked, the extinction of all creatures will be expected.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 148, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...m. The smart of human is trended toward a think that the life of others would not to be...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, regarding, so, well, for instance, in my opinion, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 84.0 52.1666666667 161% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2740.0 1977.66487455 139% => OK
No of words: 503.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44731610338 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03147473957 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536779324056 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 884.7 618.680645161 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 13.0 3.08781362007 421% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.6612725055 48.9658058833 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.222222222 100.406767564 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9444444444 20.6045352989 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61111111111 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367433688128 0.236089414692 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117799696381 0.076458572812 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643506642463 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225941986897 0.150856017488 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509491014824 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 11.7677419355 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 58.1214874552 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.1575268817 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.01818996416 125% => OK
difficult_words: 161.0 86.8835125448 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.002688172 185% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.247311828 185% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.