“When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success.” Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position.
The dream of people who live in this world is to become successful. Most of them know that hard work is the main component that builds the whole path of success for everyone. There is also a controversial question on whether luck has an influence on the success of people or not. However, from my sight, like everything else, that path need a decoration which I call 'luck'.
To begin with, the luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity. From my personal experience, now, I am the one who can resemble my country in the International Olympiads. However, back then, when the first exam of Physics which decides should I belong in the preparation of my teacher or not. I got the exact same score as my friend, but I accepted and she did not. I was the one who prepared myself for a long time, but she did not and that is when I truly believed the luck exists. The penicillin would not be invented if the luck did not exist. As an illustration, the scientist tried hard to get a resistant thing to the virus at that time, but he could not find anything. After all, the penicillin found from the dirty sink that was not washed three days. Is not it luck?
Furthermore, the luck appears when people take a risk and I think luck is the confidence of people. This is because only the ones who work hard and know it will decide to take a risk, not because they are brave. Take a look at the inventor of Facebook that has become the most popular site throughout the world as an example. He has a faith for himself which lead him to left his IvyLeague school-Harvard. I believe this is the position that his luck comes to him at first. Also, the hard work cannot completely drive the people to success by itself because they have a lack of confidence for themselves if they do not feel the luck by themselves. When people do not experience the luck before, they avoid getting into trouble, so, they literally afraid of taking risks.
All in all, the quotas drove from real life, they are not imaginary. Also, there is enough evidence to prove that luck exists in here.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-15 | bikram | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | suhas201227 | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-17 | nicktyranov | 83 | view |
| 2019-04-05 | gkb | 60 | view |
| 2019-01-10 | zekboy | 66 | view |
- TPO-34 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.U 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-44 - Independent Writing Task Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing th 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?An ability of read and write is more important today than in the past.Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 76
- “When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success.” Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 784, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lucks'?
Suggestion: lucks
...at was not washed three days. Is not it luck? Furthermore, the luck appears when ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 149, Rule ID: KNOW_NOW[4]
Message: Did you mean 'now'?
Suggestion: now
...because only the ones who work hard and know it will decide to take a risk, not beca...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, so, then, after all, i think, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.44502617801 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49221259097 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515706806283 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5162295853 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.1818181818 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3636363636 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22727272727 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176963553723 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536301136214 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516435313477 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0948375712665 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539854487918 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 11.7677419355 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.23 10.9000537634 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.