I utterly agree with the concept that, students learn better and have more efficacious function when they are working in groups rather than being all alone. I support this ground because of the fact that students exploit more from others' interpretation and frame of mind in groups. The competival and more enthusiastic working and the more insight over the project are the other superior reasons why I believe this way.
First I think that, in groups children can get familiar with other students' perspectives. It is very common that we make a scheme and after mentioning and representing it for someone else we became to this understanding that, we haven't noticed some other details. We all have our own blind sides and when it comes to group works these blind sides start to fade away and we get to look at a scheme from different points of views that each of the group members have. Thus a team project will be more complete than a solo project.
Furthermore, I hold this believe that children are more effected by their friends and others on their own age than their teacher. Teachers although are mostly acclaimed and respected by students but, when it comes to friends, they totally act differently. Children know their friends as themselves like they are one. Accordingly, any opinion from a daily wearing clothes to how should a project go has more impact on them. In fact I hold this belief that, a friendly atmosphere not only will be more interesting for the pupils and they will learn more from their group mates but also, will take the project more serious and know it more competival and they will work with more perseverance and enthusiastically so, they would be the first group and be better than others.
At last the other thing that worth a word is that, group project has the advantage that the pupils get to review their research when they are sharing it with others. When an individual has the duty to complete a project or research about something, it is less likely to review it every now and then. On the other hand, when you are in a team after completing your part of the research you must have a gathering with the others to talk about it. These gatherings might even bring up some controversies in which, students should have enough insight through their section to be able to convince the other parties.
In conclusion, the statistics show that group projects are eighty percent more successful than the sole ones. Although some introverted people might prefer the sole projects, but as it is mentioned the utilization of other peoples' prospective, the fun friendly dominant atmosphere and at the end more reviewing and deeper understanding over the project are only some of the lucrative features that group projects engift students with.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
I utterly agree with the concept that, s...
^^
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...e with the concept that, students learn better and have more efficacious function when...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
... being all alone. I support this ground because of the fact that students exploit more from others inter...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 423, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uperior reasons why I believe this way. First I think that, in groups children c...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 232, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...e became to this understanding that, we havent noticed some other details. We all have...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 468, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ws that each of the group members have. Thus a team project will be more complete th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be more complete than a solo project. Furthermore, I hold this believe that ch...
^^
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...lo project. Furthermore, I hold this believe that children are more effected by thei...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 626, Rule ID: KNOW_NOW[4]
Message: Did you mean 'now'?
Suggestion: now
... will take the project more serious and know it more competival and they will work w...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...first group and be better than others. At last the other thing that worth a wor...
^^
Line 4, column 282, Rule ID: EVERY_NOW_AND_THEN[1]
Message: Use simply 'now and then'.
Suggestion: now and then
...mething, it is less likely to review it every now and then. On the other hand, when you are in a t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e able to convince the other parties. In conclusion, the statistics show that ...
^^
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...understanding over the project are only some of the lucrative features that group projects ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... group projects engift students with.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, furthermore, if, look, so, then, thus, i think, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2301.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 477.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82389937107 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57331868755 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473794549266 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 693.0 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.9271413097 48.9658058833 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.833333333 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 20.6045352989 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 5.5376344086 253% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298436731564 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09966162019 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608254606112 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178335762832 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068068372423 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.