When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Projects are one of the most essential fragments of the educational progress that different teachers have different ideas about how to assign them to learners. Although, many believe that it is finer for students to work on projects by themselves which help them consolidate their knowledge, other claim that projects must be conducted to group of scholars. I firmly concur with latter group for some reasons, on which I will elucidate on ensuing paragraphs.
To begin with, doing projects in group is very beneficial, because it helps learners inspect the problems from many facets. To be crystal clear, a diverse group of people consisted of individuals that have distinct experiences and backgrounds leading them to have different perspective in life. This difference can be helpful a lot, because maybe a way of thinking for solving a problem would not be adequate. As a result, groups can perform much more effectively in doing projects because they can inspect the problem from every possible angle which help students augment their gain of knowledge that seems promising. To cite an illustration, I can recall my school years that my teacher changed his way of assigning projects. He shifted to group projects. When I started to solve problems with group, my understanding soared because my friends shared their ideas in group about projects which always surprised me and enhanced my way of thinking. That decision had a conspicuous impact on my educational progress that year. I would not boost my absorbing class material had I not worked on projects with my friends.
Secondly, doing assignments by the help of others can be the cause of increasing marks of students, because they do not repeat their mistakes on the exam. To be more specific, most of the students think that their solution is true, or they are too shy to ask for the solution from teacher. But, when students working together they check each other’s solutions, and will be aware of the best and accurate solution for every problem. Consequently, they do not repeat their own mistakes in the final exams which levels up their GPA, and help them enrich their resume. For example, my cousin started to work with his friends on the class projects one year before ending high school. Because he was an introverted person, he did not ask from his teacher for help on class. But, that way help him a lot to soared his marks, because he became familiar with the optimum answers of the solutions. One year later, he got accepted by Princeton University for of his excellent GPA of his last year of school.
In conclusion, working on assignments in group is very beneficial for the learners that have a striking influence on their performance. This way, not only help students to reach a preferable understanding of class material, but also assists them to increase their marks which is an immense asset.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2402.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 484.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96280991736 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69675512756 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48347107438 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 705.6 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1015674029 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.181818182 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240574140899 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723872485199 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694173899631 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16148037059 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381875257358 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.