when treachers assign project that students must work together , the students learn more efficiency that when they are asked to work alone
Nowadays, teachers utilize various methods to improve the learning quality of their students by giving different project to them. There also have been two contrasting attitudes toward this; while some believe that assigning team work activities have beneficial results for students, others adhere to the idea that it is really hard for teachers to evaluate the performance of individuals in a group. I support the former view. In what follows, I will elaborate on my viewpoints.
First, working in a group helps students to learn from other students because they want to achieve their goals together. Students have different skills in a group and they should learn others things that they know well to improve the performance of a group. Finally all members learn new skills which help them in their future life. To shed light on reason, I want to bring up an example in which I was involved. In the second year of bachelor studies at university we had an assignment to design a concrete structure in a group. Students knew different software and they share they knowledge with others so all members learned novel things. This example aptly illuminates how beneficial and important it is to assign group projects to students than alone activities.
Second, the more students work with others in a group, the more they will learn how to colloborate with people in different situations. The ability to colloborate with peoples plays an important role in prosperous of students in future. In the progressive and sophisticated world that we live, individuals need to cooperate with others in different situation like job to fullfill their requirements. For instance, google company hires new employees not opnly based on the academic knowleedge of people but also colloborating skills in a main factor to accept them. This ability is really vital for companies because they can reach to their goals by using many employees and absorb new consumers.
Third, working in a group reduces the rate of errors and personal faults which affects the final results of a group. The data and reasearching process will control by different members so the final conclusion is totally acceptable and confident. The asian society of managing industrail companies found that about about 70 percent of projects which handle by professional teams was succesful and have accurate results based on the realistic data. Having minimum of errores in results is a succesful acivement of team work activities.
In conclusion, contemplating all aforementioned reason, one can logically conclude that assigning group project to students improve their skills and help them to learn new things. Furthermore, they will practice how to colloborate with others to aqcuire accurate results which is necessary for having a prosperous job in future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... goals together. Students have different skills in a group and they should learn ...
^^
Line 2, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and they should learn others things that they know well to improve the performan...
^^
Line 2, column 210, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey should learn others things that they know well to improve the performance of ...
^^
Line 2, column 261, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
... to improve the performance of a group. Finally all members learn new skills which help...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...mportant role in prosperous of students in future. In the progressive and sophisticated w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the progressive and sophisticated world that we live, individuals need to cooper...
^^
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le company hires new employees not opnly based on the academic knowleedge of peop...
^^
Line 4, column 309, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: about
...anaging industrail companies found that about about 70 percent of projects which handle by ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...emplating all aforementioned reason, one can logically conclude that assigning gr...
^^
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... practice how to colloborate with others to aqcuire accurate results which is ne...
^^
Line 5, column 278, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thers to aqcuire accurate results which is necessary for having a prosperous jo...
^^
Line 5, column 303, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e results which is necessary for having a prosperous job in future.
^^
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... necessary for having a prosperous job in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, really, second, so, third, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2363.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 453.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21633554084 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80448437701 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490066225166 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 722.7 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4033524072 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.409090909 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5909090909 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 5.5376344086 235% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224512028262 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719669791646 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753052875963 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130536995007 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602789619717 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.