When you are assigned an important presentation for work or school, do you prefer to work on it right away so that you can work on it a little bit every day, or wait until you have a good idea about the presentation?
Handling a presentation is a demanding task for students and employees as well. Presenting a scientific subject, technological matter or whatever has different stages and the preparation is one of the most formidable steps. In order to prepare for a presentation project, the opinions are divided as to whether people should spend their time on the presentation daily or they must wait until an innovative idea ignites their creativity for the presentation. When it comes to me, it is my firm conviction that the benefits of devoting our time frequently are more than that of waiting for novel ideas. To support this, there are several reasons, two of which are going to be aptly explored in the following.
The first thing coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is concerned with the issue that, to solve a problem or to manage a project, regardless of what it is, a presentation, a practical project, theoretical article or whatever, we need investigation and a vast literature review. Understanding of all ins and outs about the subject is a requirement for our further creative opinions or taking the prudent course of actions. This step is really time consuming and requires a painstaking attention everyday by our deadline.
The second reason behind my opinion is rooted in the fact that nowadays, people have a very hectic daily schedule and they do not have enough time to fulfill their responsibility whenever they want or wait for throwing out novel opinions. Good and innovative ideas require a free mind and in our current lifestyle in which, we are under great amount of pressures and tensions, expectation of creativity without obtaining enough information and devoting our daily time is a big mistake. I share a personal example to illuminate this matter. In my master, I had to measure the absorbed hydrogen concentration of my steel samples. Unfortunately, we did not have required equipment for this precise measurement. I started to enrich my knowledge about this subject. I studied numerous articles from dawn to dusk. At the end of the day, I found out a new approach of hydrogen measurement which was practical regarding our laboratory devices. This experience taught me daily focus on a project would be a requirement for new opinions.
In brief, Not only daily concentration on a presentation or a project lets us to gather more information in order to broaden our related knowledge about the subject but also it will boost the possibility of innovative thoughts and notions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...ation project, the opinions are divided as to whether people should spend their time on the p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 27, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind elucidating'.
Suggestion: mind elucidating
... following. The first thing coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is concerned with the iss...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, really, regarding, second, so, well, as to, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2097.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05301204819 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05758351555 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563855421687 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 672.3 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.3265235213 48.9658058833 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.5 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0555555556 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109122702527 0.236089414692 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0337126571261 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359833809297 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0674971485118 0.150856017488 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465300055406 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.