When you are assigned an important presentation for work or school, do you prefer to work on it right away so that you can work on it a little bit every day, or wait until you have a good idea about the presentation?
Academic or work assignments always have been a subject of utter importance to professors or managers. Some assignments at the workplace are regarding presentation that benefit of career position improvement and lead to high-ranked position in the job. On the other side, class presentations might be influential in final score or result in thesis defence. In this regard, some people are of the opinion that do this assignment in slow pace by deviding to defferent days to accomplish, while others tend to prepare some novel ideas to finish it in last days of deadline. Preferably I would choose the former method due to two reasons that I am going to elaborate in the following paragraphs.
First, by deviding the work into various days and separate times, I have enogh time to make a proper schedule to accomplish. This is to say, when I spread my work to different parts, I am really capable to focus whatever I am doing and having high concentration would result in the best presentation. In addition, if I could perform a little bit of my work every day, I would save my time and can enjoy my spare time without any concern about remnant assingment avery time. For instance, when I was working on my Master thesis, first, I completely confused and after a course of time I realized that I was absolutely frustrated while do nothing. Therefore, I decided to make a plan and I attempted to distribute all my project into whole days that I had to finish it. Consequently, I could successfuly finilize my project and prepare my presentation in my desire and it leads to my professor admiration regard my work.
Another worthwhile point to be mentioned is that working gradually on a project might bring about other novel ideas and by the way I can tackle all ongoing problems that might be happen. To be more specific, the errors will not be detectable unless we initiate the work and throughly indulge it. There will be plentiful mistakes in the progresing a project however, and it undeniable. Human should be conscious about those potential defeats and try to anticipate them while working on the project. Furthermore, when I am proceding in a work, I am confronting new ideas that strike to my mind which are advantageous for the project improvement. Hence, the more involvement in the issue, the best solutions for possible problems will come about and better can push back the frontiers.
All in all, I personally prefer to work on a presentation either academic or work gradually in a gentle speed and devide it to various times instead of doing it abruptly in a short period of time. In this way, not only I can provide a practical plan and save my time, but also novel opinions will come through and mistakes will be discoverd and solved in the best way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 335, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...tion. In addition, if I could perform a little bit of my work every day, I would save my t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 182, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...instead of doing it abruptly in a short period of time. In this way, not only I can provide a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 369, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e discoverd and solved in the best way.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, really, regarding, so, therefore, while, as to, for instance, in addition, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2289.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 482.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7489626556 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.840312612 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508298755187 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 738.0 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.7416264648 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.473684211 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3684210526 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.89473684211 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226365594513 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735883663916 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432706514668 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137474532083 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0149833333913 0.0645574589148 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.