When you decide to find a place to travel and want to compare two places, which way do you think help you make a better decision?
- read information online
- discussing with a friend who has been to those places
There are some moot points about choosing one place from two places for travel. The question of whether it is better to inquire about those places on the internet or asking friends who have been to the two places. When it comes to my position, with weighing up the pros and the cons, I strongly subscribe to the point that asking from friends is better than online inquiry. I have some reasons, the most outstanding of which will be aptly explicated in the ensuing paragraphs.
The first reason worth discussing here is that friend's information is authentic and accurate on the contrary, the online information on the internet is not correct always and exaggerate virtually. To be more specific, online information often is related to advertisement and try to fortify the knowledge. As a case to the point, I vividly remember when I wanted to choose a place for summer vacation. I was not ensured about choosing between two places and decided to gain some information about that place on the internet, therefore, I chose a place which I find some good feedback from that place on the internet. After that, I traveled and disappointed very much because everything about that place was wrong. My personal experience competently corroborates to the point that it is better to find valid information from our friends who visit those places.
By the same token, another paramount reason to be mentioned here is that friends who visit two places, can describe all positive and negative points about those places and we can choose with the broad horizon about two places but, online information usually magnify the positive aspects and dilute the negative aspects. My personal example demonstrates this reality. Two years ago I decided to went to turkey for new year holidays. Consequently, I tried to find a city in Turkey which had good weather and coastal motels. Thus, after some search on the internet, I found that <span style="font-size: 19.36px;">Antalya</span> is the best one. My friend who traveled to Antalya in summer told me that this city is very humid and have expensive motels. Therefore, I realized that some information on the internet is not valid and we should trust this information cautiously. My personal example shed some light to the point that friend's information is more reliable than online information.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned reasons, I reiterate that, online information is not authentic always, this information not only tend to exaggerate everything but also, have publicity aspects. I suggest it is better to acquire these kinds of knowledge from people who have visited those places.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
...g one place from two places for travel. The question of whether it is better to inquire about those pla...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 157, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put before the verb 'correct'.
Suggestion: always correct
...line information on the internet is not correct always and exaggerate virtually. To be more sp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, so, then, therefore, thus, on the contrary, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.0286738351 209% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2215.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06864988558 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05887778308 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45995423341 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 704.7 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.3079113981 48.9658058833 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.75 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.85 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296980208211 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925990845997 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634792374782 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198501512055 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676533891563 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.