When you have been friends with someone for a long time, is it important for you to continue the friendship even if that person does something you don't like?
By and large, it is established beyond any doubt that communication plays a prominent role in today’s world. It comes as no surprise that efforts to finding the best friends and best relationships have always been among the top priorities. A controversial question which is often raised regarding this issue is that whether people keep their relationship even if their friend do something converse to their beliefs or not. It is commonly accepted that people should break their relationship since friends gradually affect each other. While there are those who argue that friends have responsibility to each other and breaking up is not a moral behavior, so their must keep the relationship. I, to a great extent, concure with the former idea. The rationale behind this thesis will be elaborated by the most outstanding reasons.
The first exquisite point that makes me hold this belief is that friends are close to each other, what they do directly affect on other behavior. It goes without saying that, meny negative and positive behaviors are shared among them until they get quietly similar to each other. Consequently, if one of the persons has behavior that is not proper from the other view point, it is highly recommended that they not pursue their relationship. Perhaps a more specific example can shed more light on the matter. Consider two friends that one of them humiliate the people a lot, if this action is not proper from the others view point, he must break his relation with the partner. Otherwise, he himself involve in this improper behavior.
Another reason deserving some words here is that people recognize the friends as the same. In Persian culture it is an idiom that said:”if you want to know about people, you must know their friends”. This idiom provides further legitimacy and support for the fact that how much friends are close to each other. As a matter of fact, continuing the relationship with people who have improper behaviors, destroy the personality of the other.
Finally, yet importantly, breaking up with individuals who have different behavior us is quite beneficial from a psychological stand point since it can boost self-confidence and self-respect. Without any shadows of doubt, people with various personality and beliefs spend a lot of time to argue about various subjects to convince each other. In consequence, one of them dominate the other and after several times, the partner loss his confidence. As a recently conducted research at University of British Columbia, tracking life events of many friends with different insights, they realize that one of them have a sense of depression, because of the ideas imposed to him.
In conclusion, contemplating all aforementioned paragraphs, one can soon realized that breaking up with friends with different perspective is quite beneficial since not only do their behavior affect on the partner, but also they are recognized as the bad persons and loss their self-confidence. It is highly recommended that parents not underestimate the value of making proper friends for their children.
- TPO14People benefit more from traveling in their own country than foreign country. 73
- TPO24One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job. 73
- TPO9Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. 73
- TPO7It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts. 73
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing TaskIn many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 121, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...se to each other, what they do directly affect on other behavior. It goes without saying ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...imacy and support for the fact that how much friends are close to each other. As a m...
^^^^
Line 4, column 451, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recently conducted research'.
Suggestion: recently conducted research
...es, the partner loss his confidence. As a recently conducted research at University of British Columbia, trac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 193, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...ficial since not only do their behavior affect on the partner, but also they are recogniz...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, if, regarding, so, while, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, by and large, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2603.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 502.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18525896414 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91237580447 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521912350598 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 792.0 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0795465356 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.173913043 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8260869565 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82608695652 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165816067349 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469981039016 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04505882619 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104634977218 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672666426335 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.