Which of the following three ways do you think would be most effective in protecting the natural environment and why?
• Walking or cycling instead of using cars
• Recycling and reusing objects instead of throwing them in the trash
• Buying organic and chemical-free foods
In today's modern and sophisticated world, maintaining the natural environment has sparked a heated debate. In this connection, there are several avenues to prevent inhabitants from harmful effects. Although some people believe that protecting nature is possible by walking or cycling, many other people hold the view that reducing the trash by recycling them is beneficial. There is still a third group who concur with the notion that people should protect their surroundings by purchasing environmentally friendly food. I agree with the second group opinion, and I will analyze my reasons throughout this essay.
Firstly, reusing objects decreases the usage of natural sources, which people need to fulfill their requirements, so it is an effective method to maintain the environment. To be more specific, if people recycle the materials which the trash contains, they do not need to exploit the same substances again. For example, I watched a TV last night, estimating the countless number of trees that should cut each year to produce paper. It explained that there are considerable demands for papers each day, such as newspapers, advertisements, and books; thus, one can save trees by recycling paper-based rubbish. By doing so, fewer trees are needed to cut, and nature will be protected.
Secondly, utilizing rubbish again diminishes pollutions in the environment effectively, which is vital to protect it. To elucidate, if people throw the trash away, governments will destroy them either by burying them under the ground or by burning them, which are detrimental for soil and air. According to my own experience, I went to a rural area last week to give benefits from the fresh air; however, there was a tremendous amount of pollutants because of the trash. Accordingly, there was an area where trash was buried, so all the vegetation devasted, and many birds died, which hurt the inhabitant. Moreover, the air was not clean since the trash was burnt there.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on each side, I profoundly believe that it is an efficient method to reuse the trash again. Not only does recycling reduce the employing of natural sources, but it also eliminates environmental pollution.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, third, thus, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1876.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 357.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25490196078 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87909673894 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607843137255 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0082651027 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.352941176 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76470588235 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191008789916 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572839132418 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453406975219 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104645073898 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0196323484039 0.0645574589148 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.