Which one do you think is important to long-lasting friendship?
1. Help you when you need
2. Share same interest and hobby
3. mutual trust
Friends play an important role in our daily life. Without friends, we cannot grow up to well-rounded people. Therefore we should manage long-last friendships. There are several factors in a long-last friendship: help you when you need, share same interest and hobby or have mutual trust. I believe that mutual trust is the most important factor.
First of all, the mutual trust is a base of friendships. Each real friendship is established on the base of mutual trust. If a person loses the trust to the other, the relationship will broke in the future, even because of a little event. For instance, my sister’s best friend was Amy, but she found Amy deceive her several times. Therefore my sister did not believe Amy. A few days ago, they broken the friendship and the region of is just a little argument. As we know, my sister just does not want to be friends with Amy any more. So it is essential to have mutual trust in friendships.
In addition, having mutual trust can improve a more intimate friendship. Some people do not understand how to deal with the friendship with others. An effective method is to building mutual trust. For example, my best friend is Lucy, she is very busy to prepare her final exam. Hence, we have a long time no see. But we always tell own secrets each other, because we trust each other. Even though we do not have much time to stay together, we miss each other every day and our relationship is more and more intimate.
Admittedly, friends who can help you or share same interest with you are also precious. When people face difficulties, friends who help them will make they feel warm. Therefore, people want to stay friends with them constantly. And people can always have more contact with friends who have same interest and hobby with them. That because they have more topics and they can always do something they both interest together.
In the nutshell, person who wants to have a long-last friendship should have mutual trust first. I believe that mutual trust is the most important factor.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... cannot grow up to well-rounded people. Therefore we should manage long-last friendships....
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 187, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'break'
Suggestion: break
...ust to the other, the relationship will broke in the future, even because of a little...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 337, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...he found Amy deceive her several times. Therefore my sister did not believe Amy. A few da...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 399, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'broke'?
Suggestion: broke
...d not believe Amy. A few days ago, they broken the friendship and the region of is jus...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79213483146 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51643223544 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48595505618 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 508.5 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.9163759153 48.9658058833 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 63.1851851852 100.406767564 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.1851851852 20.6045352989 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 11.8709677419 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292818395066 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889610535553 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128033805596 0.0737576698707 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192804916572 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12353874888 0.0645574589148 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.7 11.7677419355 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 58.1214874552 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.1575268817 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.61 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.72 8.01818996416 84% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 86.8835125448 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.