Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
From the past, different solutions have been introduced to enhance the efficiency of workers in workplaces. Although some people claim that workforces should do the same task during the workday, it seems to me that workers should do various tasks for a couple of reasons described in the following.
To begin with, if workers perform similar tasks during the day, after a long time the will suffer daily routines and after that, they will do works carelessly. As a result, this situation has some problems: firstly, some workforces could suffer some psychological diseases such as depression in their life due to daily routines. The statistics in Iran clearly show that the vast majority of the workers who do the same tasks for a long time have more psychological problems than other workers doing various tasks. Secondly, workers perform some dangerous tasks carelessness having been created by daily routine. Thus, they do not pay enough attention to such tasks and can be injured in these situations.
Secondly, if employs perform various tasks, they could learn various abilities and after that worker could run own business, since they would have sufficient knowledge in various sectors of business. For example, my brother for a long time was working in a software company in various sectors such as marketing, making contracts, accounting, etc. After that, he could run his business and has become successful in previous knowledge.
Admittedly, if workers do the same tasks for a long time, it would be beneficial for companies in terms of training and timing cost. Nonetheless, after a long time, performing similar works by workers, the efficiency of them not only will increase but also could damage the overall throughput of companies. Since companies do not consider the abilities and performance of their workers in various sectors in which some situations lead to innovations.
To conclude, for the aforementioned reasons I strongly believe that workers should do different tasks rather than similar tasks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tasks'' or 'task's'?
Suggestion: tasks'; task's
...econdly, workers perform some dangerous tasks carelessness having been created by dai...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 325.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25538461538 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75109617744 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513846153846 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2764330087 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2142857143 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 5.45110844103 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294753578256 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115517276504 0.076458572812 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855077327635 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190616537516 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799865017798 0.0645574589148 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.