In the modern era, job satisfaction plays a pivotal role in all societies. Due to its paramount importance, scholars have tried to elevate the effectiveness of workers satisfaction. One’s happiness and self-esteem is highly dependent on satisfaction during his vocation. Opinions are divided as to whether putting different types of tasks is better for workers, or doing similar tasks all day long. Despite the fact that the effects of myriad of types of tasks cannot be preferable, it is my firm conviction that having similar tasks during the day is more important. In what follows, I will elaborate on my perspective.
The first vital point to bear in mind is that by doing similar tasks during each day, workers become sophisticated in their job after a period of time which, in turn, brings satisfaction. In other words, they gain valuable in-depth understanding of their duties and become skillful. Not only do they become expert in their specific field of vocation, but also they work more efficient during the day. To begin with, each field of job has myriad of details, and there is a need to put a lot of time and effort to learn it. The more a worker concentrates on his main major, the more he knows about every detail and becomes confident and satisfied. Take my personal experience as a compelling example; during my job in power plant technology, I had a co-employee working for more than eight years in HVAC (heating, Ventilation, and air conditioning) field. She knew every detail of this field and was able to work with complex and professional software. Facing with new challenges, she was able to handle the problem, and the most important factor of her personality was smiling all the time during her job time in that she was confident about solving various questions. That she was so successful was unbelievable. On the other hand, I worked in different fields and had not enough detail information about each one. Had I focused on one specific field, I would have had more satisfaction.
Another worthwhile reason to be mentioned is that putting different tasks for workers has detrimental effects. Workers do not pay attention to details of their duties, which, in turn, degrades the company status. Analyzing momentous amount of data in different fields, workers become exhausted and irritated. Moreover, they face the tension of the responsibility for each duty and waste most of their energy and incentive. Consequently, they do not have the sense of satisfaction. A recent study conducted in my country demonstrates that workers with more than two duties during the day are more susceptible to heart attacks than the workers with just one or two main duties all day long. On the other hand, the weak performance of workers which is the result of having different duties is the main reason for reducing the fame of the company. The ultimate result of activities of workers will not satisfy their clients and they lose their reputation.
To sum up, it is a foregone conclusion that having one type of task during the day is far better for workers to have sense of satisfaction. The fact that they become more sophisticated if they focus on one task during the day, coupled with considering the detrimental effects of having many duties during the day, is the reason which strengthens my claim. It is anticipated that governments will pay more attention to consider one task for each worker in near future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 293, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...ring his vocation. Opinions are divided as to whether putting different types of tasks is bet...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 137, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...come sophisticated in their job after a period of time which, in turn, brings satisfaction. In...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, moreover, so, then, while, as to, in other words, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 90.0 52.1666666667 173% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2857.0 1977.66487455 144% => OK
No of words: 580.0 407.700716846 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92586206897 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90746259869 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81391723442 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453448275862 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 884.7 618.680645161 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8968252324 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.035714286 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.60714285714 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357549279423 0.236089414692 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0994963555782 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087300738706 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252575866761 0.150856017488 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504140088879 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.