Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Workers' efficiency greatly affects their job satisfaction as well as the economic power of countries. Whether doing various types of tasks benefits their effectiveness and satisfaction or not has become the subject of heated debates among researchers. While some of them believe that working on different types of tasks would make them exhausted and reduce their impact, other hold the view that this could increase the industry's profit. In my view, I firmly agree with the second standpoint. In what follows, I will cogently pinpoint my conspicuous reasons to support my vantage point.
First of all, working on manifold types of tasks provides a great pool of data and experience for them. By the passage of time, they will recognize that they have flowered their potential abilities and also they have promoted their sense of self-esteem. This would result in a better lifestyle for workers. They will enjoy their time while they are working. Even great authors such as Joe Satriani and Gary Moore, two prominent scientists researching in this field of study, mention this rule of thumb in their articles:" If you want to blossom the economy, let workers increase their circle of experience". Not only this but also workers will spend more time with their family and children. Thus, the whole family would benefit and consequently, the economy will be boosted.
Another plus point to take into account is that if workers are forced to work on limited types of task, they will soon become bored and lose their creativity and power of brainstorming. In contrast, working on wide ranges of duties boost their power of thinking and end up finding out new solutions in the terra incognita. It is obvious that by recognizing their huge impact in creating novel solutions to problems, they will become far more enthusiastic about their work and put their whole efforts in their job. A comprehensive research conducted by skilled professors at the University of Toronto indicated that above 89 percent of workers who experience working on a variety of subjects see themselves as effective persons in their country. Their fruitful and marvelous results also demonstrated that these type of workers treat their family nicely, too.
To put all in a nutshell, one soon realizes that working on different subjects is so beneficial to the workers. Not only will it help them to gain higher senses of self-esteem, but it will assist them to enhance the economic status of their country. I strongly recommend doing this method to the government for increasing job satisfaction and happiness among workers.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, so, thus, well, while, in contrast, such as, as well as, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2188.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 426.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13615023474 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76355192581 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551643192488 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3533495012 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.4 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144909614469 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051043725932 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046191874937 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0944442617369 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317583490717 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.