Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long
These days, people spend a lot of time working and the way we do it really matters. Personally, I think that people prefer jobs that are versatile. Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To start with, when workers have many tasks to get done, they are constantly busy, and so their workday goes by fast. On the contrary, if employees are not challenged with many responsibilities, they will feel bored and each of their workdays will seem incredibly long, which is not going to contribute to their well-being. My personal experience is a compelling example of that. I am a pharmacy technician and my job is immensely diversified. While on duty I have to enter new prescriptions in a computer system, count medication, place them in special containers, release drugs to patients, and answer numerous phone calls. In other words, I am continuously busy at work. In this way, I have never felt bored at work, but the intense pace of my job`s routine makes it truly interesting and pleasant for me to work a shift. Since I have found this job, I have always been in a great mood and able to enjoy my life. That is why I believe that various assignments are beneficial for employees.
Secondly, when workers are challenged with a number of responsibilities, they can learn about them in detail and grow professionally. Society appreciates those who are experienced and knowledgeable. For instance, my head pharmacist is a highly professional woman. During her work day, she consults a myriad (a lot of) of patients and resolves hundreds of claims with insurance companies. Because of her expertise, all my co-workers and I have always asked her for advice if we face any problem at work. We know she has a solution for every issue. Furthermore, our customers truly appreciate her and praise her for excellence and dignity. On the other hand, if my supervisor's job had been monotonous and uniform, she could not have been so experienced in her field. A diversified job can help people to excel.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that being assigned to numerous missions at work is better than doing the same tasks all day long.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-05 | Zmx_6 | 90 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. 80
- People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment – doing things they like to do – rather than doing things they should do 76
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...rkers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: of
...r work day, she consults a myriad a lot of of patients and resolves hundreds of claim...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, really, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, i feel, i think, in conclusion, in other words, on the contrary, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1919.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7855361596 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91439162123 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556109725686 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8057665106 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4347826087 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4347826087 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.65217391304 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357541510915 0.236089414692 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882399835278 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.208185426729 0.0737576698707 282% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262005750671 0.150856017488 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.191615223391 0.0645574589148 297% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.