workers are most satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Today in our society, workers have a lot of work to choose and do. but the kind of work is determined based on the employers. Some employers eigher assign various kinds of work for their employees to do or set similar tasks for their employees all day long. I believe that, the first choice which gives worker opportunities to do different types of work is an approperiate one on accounts of many reasons.
To begin with, the more different tasks to do in the work environment, the more interesting worker. we all are humans. humans compered to machines are more innovative. therefore we can not expect humans to do all the day a same job like a machine. machines are programmed in order to do certain task in certain time but humans have the ability to think and work effectively. therefore I strongly believe that they should do different jobs.
Secondly, if workers do various jobs, they can be able to do jobs that they like. workers who like their job are more interested to do their tasks. Hence they work effectively and will increase the profit of their employers. For example, suppose a worker who does not like his job. if all the day must do the work that he does not like he will be exhaust. Eventually, he will not do his task properly and then he will affect another workers. therefore work does not advance and the employer at the end does not gain profit.
In conclusion, I think that giving different kind of jobs in a day instead of just one similar task to a worker, not only increase the workers's interest to do his best, but also will increase the net profit of that company. therefore I suggest to
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y long. I believe that, the first choice which gives worker opportunities to do d...
^^
Line 2, column 100, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...vironment, the more interesting worker. we all are humans. humans compered to mach...
^^
Line 2, column 119, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Humans
... interesting worker. we all are humans. humans compered to machines are more innovativ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 168, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...mpered to machines are more innovative. therefore we can not expect humans to do all the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 168, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: therefore,
...mpered to machines are more innovative. therefore we can not expect humans to do all the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 248, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Machines
... all the day a same job like a machine. machines are programmed in order to do certain t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 375, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
... ability to think and work effectively. therefore I strongly believe that they should do ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 375, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: therefore,
... ability to think and work effectively. therefore I strongly believe that they should do ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Workers
... can be able to do jobs that they like. workers who like their job are more interested ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 149, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... are more interested to do their tasks. Hence they work effectively and will increase...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...ose a worker who does not like his job. if all the day must do the work that he do...
^^
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ose a worker who does not like his job. if all the day must do the work that he do...
^^
Line 5, column 443, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...nd then he will affect another workers. therefore work does not advance and the employer ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 443, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: therefore,
...nd then he will affect another workers. therefore work does not advance and the employer ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 224, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...ncrease the net profit of that company. therefore I suggest to
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 224, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: therefore,
...ncrease the net profit of that company. therefore I suggest to
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, i think, in conclusion, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1977.66487455 67% => OK
No of words: 294.0 407.700716846 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53401360544 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53646870065 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 212.727598566 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469387755102 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 419.4 618.680645161 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.816870207 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.1578947368 100.406767564 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4736842105 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68421052632 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 16.0 5.5376344086 289% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.6 11.7677419355 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 86.8835125448 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.