You have been told that dormitory rooms at your university must be shared by two students. Would you rather have the university assign a student to share a room with you, or would you rather choose your own roommate? Use specific reasons and details to explain your answer.
The life at university is considered to be an essential period among most students. While some students prefer to have roommate that they have been assigned by the university, I hold the opposite view. I believe that it is better for students to choose their roommate by their own.
To begin with, when students choose their roommate on their own, they would feel comfortable to get along with the roommate. It does not take long time between the two students to accustom to each other because they already know each other well. My own experience is a compelling example of this. In my first year at Kally University, I did not choose my roommate in the dormitory because the policy for the university at that time did not allow freshman students to choose their roommate. Therefore, I struggled with my assigned roommate because he had very strange personality; he mainly talked about soccer players. Everyday he used to watch soccer and sometimes he goes to the stadium and watch live game there. For me honestly, I did not like soccer at all, so I did not hang out with my roommate and I did not like his speech about soccer too. Obviously, I did not get along with my roommate at all, so I was sleeping at that time at my friend Ahmed home.
Adding to the previous point, when students do not choose their roommate by their own, they can have irresponsible roommate that can destroy their academic life. For instance, imagine a roommate who is not quite, and he/ she use to play loud music in the room. Thus, the other roommate would struggle with his/her study or even with his/her sleep. So, this will have negative effect on his/her performance at university. She/ he will not sleep well at night, so she/he might miss classes or even not study hard.
In conclusion, I encourage students to decided who is going to share the room with them at the dormitory. This is because it allows them to get together easily, and it enable them to avoid having irresponsible students with them in the room.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 620, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[1]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective, and the comma is missing. Did you mean 'every day, he'?
Suggestion: Every day, he
... he mainly talked about soccer players. Everyday he used to watch soccer and sometimes he g...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 225, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... roommate who is not quite, and he/ she use to play loud music in the room. Thus, t...
^^^
Line 3, column 225, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'uses'.
Suggestion: uses
... roommate who is not quite, and he/ she use to play loud music in the room. Thus, t...
^^^
Line 3, column 512, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ht miss classes or even not study hard. In conclusion, I encourage students to d...
^^^^
Line 4, column 169, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'enables'?
Suggestion: enables
...ows them to get together easily, and it enable them to avoid having irresponsible stud...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, honestly, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 43.0788530466 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63483146067 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48167758704 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491573033708 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.0 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6802692767 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6666666667 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38888888889 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217995187711 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764815450096 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424512915033 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150379434171 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324038127003 0.0645574589148 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.