It goes without saying that in this sophisticated and radically progressive era in which we live, all human being have always been in a great struggle to create as well as maintain their friendship strong with someone. Whereas some people debate that if your friend made a mistake that you do not like it, you should keep him away, on the other side of the continuum, stand others, believing that under such a circumstance, you should still keep your friendship with him. As far as I am concerned, I categorically concur with the second mental attitude, believing that all individuals shall keep their close friends when they make a mistake because friendship is actually precious. In the ensuing essay, my perspective will be perspicuously substantiated by the underlying and conspicuous reasons.
To begin with, it is no secret to anyone that all individuals make mistakes unintentionally in this hectic life. Consequently, if one of our friends makes a mistake without any awareness, we will be able to have a discussion with him about his fault and moreover, explains him the situation what we are upset. Under such a circumstance, he will easily understand his fault and does not repeat it again in the near future. To be more specific, it would be better for all persons to talk about their friends’ faults to them rather than breaking their friendship with those people. An example can considerably shed some light on this subject. Several years ago, I had an argument and disagreement with one of my best friends, Saman. Saman made an awkward mistake which adversely affected my mentality. After some days, when I calmed down, I talked to him about why he did that. He told me that his fault was not intentionally and I convinced and preferred to keep my friendship with him. This really reveals that if I did not make a discussion and speak face to face, our friendship would have broken at the present time.
Furthermore, one of the most exquisite and momentous point about long friendship is that this issue will not obtain readily and all persons should keep until they can. This is because a close friend, who really knows you for several years, is always with you in problems in order to empower you over facing the problems. In such a situation, it would not be a great idea to dismiss your friend only for one mistake. An example can drive this notion dramatically home. In the aforementioned example, due to the fact that I knew my friend for ten years and also I definitely assured that he did not carry out that mistake purposely, I forgave him. This is because I remembered how he assisted me to become successful and prosperous in my job when I had confronted a huge problem.
In conclusion, taking into account the aforementioned reasons and examples, I am of opinion that if our friend does something that we do not like it, we should still keep him as one of our friends. This is because we can easily settle down this issue without breaking our friendship by making a discussion and talking about his mistakes that actually have bothered us, and also a close friendship is not achieved easily.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, consequently, furthermore, if, moreover, really, second, so, still, well, whereas, in conclusion, talking about, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 100.0 43.0788530466 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2593.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 542.0 407.700716846 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78413284133 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82502781895 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79804149954 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481549815498 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 798.3 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 21.0 9.59856630824 219% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7901203432 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.863636364 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6363636364 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312991607874 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812972041776 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921628514099 0.0737576698707 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202550676231 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.087936559259 0.0645574589148 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.