young people enjoy more than the older. Therefore, I agree with this statement that young people enjoy life more than older people do
I do not have doubt that many olders people enjoy much the life, however I also do not have doubt that young people enjoy more than the older. Therefore, I agree with this statement that young people enjoy life more than older people do. Thus, I have two reasons to support my opinions.
First, young people usually have more energy to do the things if compared with olders people. The corage, is a thing that the teenager have a lot, and this is a tool that increase the wish of then enjoy the life. For example, I and my friends were talking with our parents and we were comparing our life’s. We started talking about the courage of the people have to do the radical sports, and all of us that were young have courage to do, and only on mother said that had corage. They told us when they were more youngest they had corage, however today is not. Thus whith this meet I could percived that is of nature of young people.
Second, the tecnology have encouraged the young people do things that make than enjoy the life. Since that have many places that are paradisiac and beatiful that can be observed in the Internet for the mobile, tablet and computer. This make young people try to travel to these places. For instance, the number of backpacker have increase in the world, in these people are young people. I read in a news peaper that young people have enjoyed the life travelling, and how many people don't have enough money to travel they created a lot websites to help each other. In the interview that i read in a section in a newspaper, it was saying that there are some websites that you work in a place like a hostel and you can live to enjoy the place. The website have work to backpackers oround the world.
In conclusion, I agree with this statement and I think that young people have enjoyed the life more than older, and that the tecnology have help the young tpeople to enjoy it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'youngest' (without 'more') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: youngest
...had corage. They told us when they were more youngest they had corage, however today is not. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 567, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... they had corage, however today is not. Thus whith this meet I could percived that i...
^^^^
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat have many places that are paradisiac and beatiful that can be observed in the...
^^
Line 5, column 484, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...he life travelling, and how many people dont have enough money to travel they create...
^^^^
Line 5, column 587, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... help each other. In the interview that i read in a section in a newspaper, it wa...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 351.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.45014245014 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.1394095536 2.67179642975 80% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 212.727598566 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.438746438746 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 491.4 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.436148102 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8823529412 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6470588235 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35294117647 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.562825027752 0.236089414692 238% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.226585824258 0.076458572812 296% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.255804390093 0.0737576698707 347% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.466176716923 0.150856017488 309% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.201369553402 0.0645574589148 312% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.53 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.