Young people should try different jobs before they decide which job or career they will choose in the long term.
Previous job has a substantial effect on the next job of an individual. This is because it provides with all the prerequisite for the next one. Different people held conflicting claims on whether or not one should try out various works before deciding on a specific one. In my own opinion it may not be a wise choice to try out different jobs before deciding on a long term career. I will be developing my reasoning in the subsequent paragraphs.
First of all, the job requirement of today does not allow us the luxury of experiencing a wide variety of jobs. This is because, nowadays companies do not hire anybody out of the blue; they need a certain period of work experience from every candidate. Under this circumstances, if we want to secure a stable job then we need to stay in a job long enough in order to have some references. For instance, a while back my friend asked me to recommend him in a job opening on my company. However, he had no credible references because he used to wander between various jobs and no owner took him seriously. As a result, he didn’t get the job. This personal experience shows that wandering in between jobs is not a wise choice.
Secondly, a person trying out different jobs will not gain enough experience to be better at a single one. As evident from the famous adage, Jack of all but ace of none, maundering different work place will develop sufficient skills to master one. In addition, jobs of today demand sufficient technical expertise, to develop which a person has to stay in a single workplace for at least a year. Let us take an example of an automated car manufacturing company. An employee working here needs to dedicate at least a year so that he can learn the technical skills of handling the machines. From this example, we can see the disadvantage of strolling between various jobs.
Finally, many of us cannot afford working at various places, just for having a better choice of career. This is because as soon as we graduate we come up with the responsibility of looking after our family. My own personal experience profoundly explains this claim. Two years ago, I graduated from my college and instantly I got a job offering in a local software company. Now at that time, I did not have the choice of abandoning that job and starting to search for a better career. This was because being a single son, I had the responsibility of supporting my family. So, it will not be an exaggeration to say that family responsibility will be a hurdle in experiencing different jobs.
To sum up, I do not agree with the idea of experiencing different jobs until we find our choice mainly for the above mentioned reasons of less experience, job insecurity and family responsibility.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...erent people held conflicting claims on whether or not one should try out various works before...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 260, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... experience from every candidate. Under this circumstances, if we want to secure a s...
^^^^
Line 15, column 35, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to work'.
Suggestion: to work
... Finally, many of us cannot afford working at various places, just for having a be...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, while, as to, at least, for instance, in addition, as a result, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2276.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 484.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70247933884 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87459888722 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495867768595 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 733.5 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.953346976 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5384615385 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6153846154 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288635936808 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758789125393 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748404019186 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165499971171 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0847279536149 0.0645574589148 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.