Your city has decided to build a statue or monument to honour a famous person in your country. Whom would you choose? Use reasons and specific examples to support your choice.
Nowadays there are lots of statues and monuments to honour people in cities which can remind us to feel grateful for what they may have done to our country and society. In France many personalities come to my mind, such as Charles de Gaulle, Victor Hugo, Molière or Simone Veil. If I had to decide whom would my city build, I would choose Simone Weil. This essay will further discuss reasons to support my choice.
Firstly, her life needs to be known to understand why she is the perfect famous people for our statue or monument. She was a young Jewish girl during WWII and she survived the Shoah and the death camps, which yet shows how strong she was even during her teenage years. WWI and WWII have affected every French, in this respect, a survivor from this period is always a good choice of statue.
However, surviving the holocaust is not even close to her only action! She was a huge help to the independence of women in France and thanks to her, women get the chance to abort legally. From a feminism point of view, this makes Simone Veil the perfect figure of the political French scene.
On top of that, she was elected as the first woman president of the European Parliament. She was the one who prepared Europe for the entry of ex-communism countries and who helped Europe to be known by more people.
To conclude, I strongly believe that Simone Veil is the perfect person who can be chosen to get a statue or a monument erected. In addition to her contribution to improve women conditions, she was a huge actor in the European development. As she died 1 year and a half ago, this would be a great reminder for all what she did for France.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 46, Rule ID: FIRST_WOMAN_NOUN[1]
Message: We wouldn't say "first man president". Use 'female'.
Suggestion: female
...p of that, she was elected as the first woman president of the European Parliament. S...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, in addition, such as, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1363.0 1977.66487455 69% => OK
No of words: 303.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49834983498 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37343068538 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587458745875 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 618.680645161 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4191073294 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3571428571 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108542812571 0.236089414692 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458438428231 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666080892698 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0597389349189 0.150856017488 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0779736805993 0.0645574589148 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.82 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.