The reading material discusses about the Voynich manuscript which was written on vellum and in code. The author proposes three possible writer for it .In the lecture, professor makes a series of points that cast doubt on possibility of each of the proposed writers presented in the reading passage. He states none of these could be the maniscript's writer.
First of all, the lecturer refutes the Anthuny Ascham as author of manuscript which was proposed in the passage. He says Anthony was an ordinary physicion and scientist not a very genius person and his other work showed his capabilities. So for him would be unlikely to write something genius and magical.Therefore, the possibility of being writer was rejected .
Moreover, the professor refutes the possibility of making fake maniscript by Kelly to make money by selling it to nobles at that time. He states it is unlikely that he made complex code book just for making money. Professor clarifies people at that time were very easy to fool and there was no need to make such a complex script code to fool them and make money. He believes if it would be a fake one it would be much simpler which did not need any effort and energy to make it.
Lastly, the speaker refutes the idea of fake creation of the maniscript by Voynich.He points out that by dating methode nowadays it is easy to date the items from the past. He states by this modern method it was clear that ink was originated from 400 years ago which can not be definitely a work of Voynich.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 168, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... that has been proposed for explanation.In the lecture, professor makes a series o...
^^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...this modern method it was clear that ink was originated from 400 years ago which ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, lastly, moreover, so, well, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1173.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 255.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6 5.08290768461 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3817517195 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560784313725 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1404691789 49.2860985944 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.636363636 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0918836002574 0.272083759551 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0339956611831 0.0996497079465 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363807993092 0.0662205650399 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0604958478299 0.162205337803 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364923935277 0.0443174109184 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 53.8541721854 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 12.2367328918 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.