The lecture and the reading are both discussing about the origin of silver coin in the united states. The reading states that coin is not genuine historical evidence and provides three reasons of support, while the lecture argues that silver coin is not fake and it represents real presence of historical evidence.
First of all, the reading claims that native site of coin is far from the site where Norse settled in the united states in the north america. The lecture counter this point by stating that not just the silver coin, but many other objects were found from the great distance. the professor explains that native Americans traveled to far distance and they were interested in the collecting different objects and possibly native Americans bought that coins from Norse.
In addition, the reading states that not any coins were found in the Canada which inhabited by the Norse. The lecture refutes this point by explaining that It is not necessarily Norse brought that coin. Norse created some settlement. Norse packed up his valuable things with packing silver coins and he brought that silver coins back to the Europe.
Lastly, the reading mentions that silver coin was useless in those days. The lecture argues this point by explaining Norse would not use of coins for the currency. The professor explains that silver coins is very special beauty that used to make jewelries like necklaces. Norse could trade those Jewelries to the american natives and that's how it brought to the states.
In conclusion, The lecture represents very strong points to believe that silver coin found in the united states is not fake as well is historical evidence.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gues that silver coin is not fake and it represents real presence of historical e...
^^
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...cts were found from the great distance. the professor explains that native American...
^^^
Line 7, column 335, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...e Jewelries to the american natives and thats how it brought to the states. In con...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t fake as well is historical evidence.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, lastly, so, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1396.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 277.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03971119134 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29960215103 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462093862816 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 424.8 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0657116592 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7142857143 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299460634428 0.272083759551 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118632049725 0.0996497079465 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054640271361 0.0662205650399 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181586045297 0.162205337803 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301262598321 0.0443174109184 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.