The lecture and the reading are both discussing about the human survival on the Venus. The reading claims human presence on the Venus is not possible due to extreme conditions and three reasons to support the idea, while the lecture argues that human survival is certainly possible on the Venus.
First of all, the reading states the atmospheric pressure on the Venus is 90 times higher than the Earth. The speaker refutes this point with establishment of floating station 50 km above than the Venus surface. Everyone knows higher the distance lower the pressure. Now pressure at the floating station is equivalent to the atmospheric pressure at the Earth.
In addition, the reading argues that no water reservoir present on the Venus, while the lecture counter this point by stating that we can produce the water by using sulfuric acid and carbon dioxide present on the Venus surface and we can create water reservoir for human survival. The lecture defends this point.
Lastly, the reading states about the very little sunlight on the Venus surface because thick clouds. The lecture counteracts this point by stating that 50 km above the Venus where floating station made, cloud is not thick so it can easily reflects the sunlight on the Venus surface. Another explanation is floating station contains solar plates which reflects sunlight from above and below which we can use to generate electricity.
In conclusion, the speaker created very strong arguments by defeating all the points made in the reading.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 240, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'reflect'
Suggestion: reflect
...de, cloud is not thick so it can easily reflects the sunlight on the Venus surface. Anot...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, lastly, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1274.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 249.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11646586345 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43000097934 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481927710843 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 385.2 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.3883251952 49.2860985944 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.166666667 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128480232615 0.272083759551 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497655374368 0.0996497079465 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066904174948 0.0662205650399 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0728305473657 0.162205337803 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783469284741 0.0443174109184 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.