The lecture and the reading are both discussing about the clot seeding. While the reading states that cloud seeding is effective to protect crops from the hail, the lecture refutes this by saying that it is not clear about effectiveness of cloud seeding and explains the reason for that.
First of all, through the reading claims that through laboratory experience, silver iodide forms a snow mist that way is helpful for the crops. The lecture argues that under laboratory condition, silver iodide can prevent any kind of precipitation that can cause lack of water which is not a good thing. the lecture gives an example that because of lack of water, on entire seeding are that can cause grout and cause damage through out the different area because of lack of water.
In addition, the reading makes argument that Cloud seeding is very effective on the evidence from some of the Asian countries. The lecture counters this point by stating that it's only effective in the urban areas. He explains by stating that the city is high polluted area and can create favorable condition for the cloud seeding which may not possible in the unpolluted or farming area.
Lastly, the reading passage argues that one local study in farming region shows reduced hail damage. The lecture dismisses this claim by explaining that local study is not convincing. According to lecture, cloud seeding is not just affecting many areas, it affects entire neighbor hood area ad can create natural variation of the environment condition.
In conclusion, We should prevent cloud seeding at any cost. it creates more disadvantages than advantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ack of water which is not a good thing. the lecture gives an example that because o...
^^^
Line 3, column 425, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...e that can cause grout and cause damage through out the different area because of lack of w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 99, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... is very effective on the evidence from some of the Asian countries. The lecture counters t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 61, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ould prevent cloud seeding at any cost. it creates more disadvantages than advanta...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, lastly, may, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 269.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07063197026 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47738210456 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53531598513 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9970413343 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.923076923 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12697513463 0.272083759551 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426335907469 0.0996497079465 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375761046127 0.0662205650399 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0694626153624 0.162205337803 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284217632046 0.0443174109184 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.