As far as I concern, people have been debating about the pros and cons of the technology. Some people believe that with the help of technology, children can develop their creativity, while other people raise their opinion about that technology made children less creative. Technology is a broad medium, depends on how you use it. From my personal view point, I strongly believe that Children's creativity has been decreased because of technology.
To begin with, Technology can put negative impact on children's physical and emotional behavior. Now days, Director make all animation and imagination movies for children with different characters which kids think those characters are real and try to imitate same moves, that could be harmful. I will take my personal experience to illustrate this. I have 5 years old boy. one we went to watch movie "Superman", he loved that movie and he took "superman" as his idol. Next day morning, We went to his room and my son hang big rope around his body and was trying to fly from the table and he thought he is a superman. Fortunately, I reached into my son's room on time and saved his life. That experience made me think that some animation movies can negatively affect children's behavior.
The another reason is that children can get home bound with the technology. They do not show any interest for the outdoor sports, also Sitting and paying x-box or internet games lead to obesity and postural aches in the young age. For example, When I was a kid, I used to play outdoor games on weekend or after the schools like Cricket which helped me to improve my confidence, physical stamina and social communication. When I see my kids playing al internet based games all day long, It breaks my heart. I try to encourage and motivate my children to play outdoor sports which creates more positive effect compare to homebound technology entertainment.
However, Some people might asset that technology can create positive influence on children by developing the mathematics, physics and calculation skills. Which is true too. Again as per my view, It completely depends on everyone's thinking. According to a survey recently released by the federal research center, more than two thirds of parents believe that technology has been creating negative effect on children's creativity.
All in all, I strongly consider that technology made my children less creative by affecting physical and emotional behavior as well children get home bound. In general, I wholeheartedly believe that the very first thing we should do now is to admit the negative impact of the technology on children's creativity as the key to open the door of our bleak future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 351, Rule ID: HAVE_CD_YEARS[1]
Message: This phrase is used with 'be': 'be 5 years old'.
Suggestion: be 5 years old
...rsonal experience to illustrate this. I have 5 years old boy. one we went to watch movie 'S...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 373, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...llustrate this. I have 5 years old boy. one we went to watch movie 'Superman&a...
^^^
Line 10, column 155, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...matics, physics and calculation skills. Which is true too. Again as per my view, It c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, third, well, while, for example, in general, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2268.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0625 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90087897921 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553571428571 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 709.2 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9889145041 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6086956522 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4782608696 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.82608695652 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212421917126 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577276203355 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664945332813 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134223400043 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716412143209 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.