The reading states that the the European silver coin dating to eleventh century, discovered in Maine in United states in 1957 was not a genuine historical evidence; and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor explains that the coin unearthed is not fake and is a true evidence of the norse's settlement coming in contact with the Native Americans.Therefore, she refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the article posits that the location of the discovery of the European silver coin in United states was very far from the Norse settlement which was in far eastern canada. The lecturer challenges this points and states that there were other objects found at the same site of the coin which belonged to the places far away. She explains that American who travelled great distances would have visited Norse settlement and brought their silver coin back to the Maine.
Second, the reading avers that evidence of no other coins at the canadian sites supports the idea that Norse did not bring any silver coins to America. The professor rebuts this argument and says that Europeans did not create any permanent settlement. Thus, while packing their belongings for the return voyage, they would have packed all the coins which they brought with them. Thus, while returning, they took all the coins back with them.
Finally, the reading claims that Norse would have realised that the silver coins were of no use to the North Americans. Conversely, the professor mentions that Norse would have understood that Americans valued attractive and unusual objects, which they could use in their necklaces or other jewellery. Consequently, Norse would have used those coins to trade with them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
The reading states that the the European silver coin dating to eleventh...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
The reading states that the the European silver coin dating to eleventh...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 366, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...ng in contact with the Native Americans.Therefore, she refutes each of the authors reason...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, conversely, finally, first, however, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 279.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13620071685 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48549704464 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505376344086 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 430.2 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6678571277 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.416666667 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287683861883 0.272083759551 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112343641784 0.0996497079465 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842711592957 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186301336123 0.162205337803 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751162616779 0.0443174109184 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.2008830022 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.