The reading asserts that, a European silver coin, which related to eleventh century,was discovered at a Native American site. Some archaeologists believe that the coins are fake due to three reasons. The lecture, however, finds the idea dubious and cast doubt on the reasons proposed by the reading passage.
The author argues that, the coins are not original because of far distance. Put in other word, it would be impossible for individuals to brought these coins with themselves for such great distance. Conversely, the lecture brings up the idea that, it is feasible for native american to bring these coins, since they were interested in obtaining objects from remote and far locations to america.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that, the second reason for approving that the coins are fake is that, no other coins have been found at the site. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that, it is true that, no coins have been discovered there, but it would be due to another reason. The Nores brought their coins with them, and they packed up all their coins and took them back, when they returned to Europe.
Finally, It is stated in the reading passage that, the Norse who traveled to america would have known that silver coins would most likely useless to them, since the Native Americans did not assume silver coins as money. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that, the Native american would not recognize the coins as in the same way we do at present time, but Nores would have understood that the coins are interesting and appealing in other applications like necklace or jewelry
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , was
... coin, which related to eleventh century,was discovered at a Native American site. S...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, furthermore, however, second, so, in contrast, it is true, on the contrary, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 280.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89642857143 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41470569044 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532142857143 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3706184352 49.2860985944 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.636363636 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4545454545 21.698381199 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6363636364 7.06452816374 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264940450742 0.272083759551 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113128832888 0.0996497079465 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781047066689 0.0662205650399 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17172994508 0.162205337803 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490446431174 0.0443174109184 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.