The reading and the passage are both about the ways to discipline a child. The author of the reading states three categories used for disciplining children. The lecturer cast doubt on all the three points. The lecturer states that discipline is directly related to self esteem. The lecturer contrast all the three points made in the reading.
First of all, the reading states that power is the one of the method to achieve discipline. It includes two things punishing the child by hitting him/her or by threatening him/her to take away things which he/she likes or loves to do. The reading says that discipline using the power is proved to be most effective strategy. However, the lecturer disputes with this point, he says that power method used in child is proved to have low self esteem. Hence power strategy develops child with low self esteem.
Secondly, the author of the reading states that second method to discipline a child is the withholding the affection, or not treating or keeping the child deprived of love, care and affection. The lecturer refutes with this point. He says that children treated with this kind of discipline develops low self esteem. The lecturer says that the power and withholding affection method should be used with caution.
Finally, the last method of discipline provided in the reading is management. This technique uses set of rules that are implemented at appropriate age level. The lecturer says that this techniques develops child with high self esteem. This method disciplines child with affection, approval and attention. When a child does right things he/she should be appreciated and parents should use this as a positive way to implement discipline in them.
In conclusion, summing up all the three methods, the main points of the reading are effectively challenged by the lecturer.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pline a child. The author of the reading states three categories used for discipl...
^^
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...egories used for disciplining children. The lecturer cast doubt on all the three po...
^^^
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...rer cast doubt on all the three points. The lecturer states that discipline is dire...
^^^
Line 1, column 280, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ine is directly related to self esteem. The lecturer contrast all the three points ...
^^^
Line 3, column 449, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...hild is proved to have low self esteem. Hence power strategy develops child with low ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 182, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...riate age level. The lecturer says that this techniques develops child with high sel...
^^^^
Line 7, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ffection, approval and attention. When a child does right things he/she should be...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, however, second, secondly, in conclusion, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11589403974 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60682685424 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453642384106 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8266311562 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.25 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1 21.698381199 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 7.06452816374 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17603729758 0.272083759551 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686987774027 0.0996497079465 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635643022946 0.0662205650399 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106529003709 0.162205337803 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476103320882 0.0443174109184 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.82 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.