The article introduces the topic of AIDS, which is one of the dreadful disease which has killed millions of the people in the world. The writer believes that drugs for the AIDS should be cheaper so that the poor people can afford it moreover the AIDS Advocacy groups (AAG) suggests the pharmaceutical companies to take part in it. The lecturer disagrees. He says that lowering the price of the drug might not feasible.
First, the author says that the profit that these big pharmaceutical companies makes are way too high and very insensitive and unethical to utilize money from the poor people for their benefit. The lecturer believes that there are flaws in the author's position. He contends that if the drug companies are unable to make good profit then it might be very difficult for them to even survive. Because, without the profit there would be no investors and without the investors there would be no money which directly leads low production of drugs.
Secondly, author suggests government to pay for drugs because if the government buys the drugs in larger amounts than the price of drug would automatically of go down. The lecturer on the other hand points out that just like the people government of the developing countries have basic economy. So, that the government doesn't have enough money to buy the drugs on larger quantities.
Finally, the reading passage notes how the organization encourages the government of developing countries to make the drugs of its own. The article establishes that it would reduce the shipping cost as well as provide many job opportunities for the poor people. The lecturer rebuts this argument. He says that it is not only unethical to make drugs like that because it is stealing pharmaceutical companies trademark but also plays with the health of people by not focusing on the quality of drug.
As you can see, the author and lecturer holds different point of view on the topic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 330, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...aceutical companies to take part in it. The lecturer disagrees. He says that loweri...
^^^
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ery insensitive and unethical to utilize money from the poor people for their ben...
^^
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...because if the government buys the drugs in larger amounts than the price of drug...
^^
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the price of drug would automatically of go down. The lecturer on the other hand ...
^^
Line 5, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ernment of the developing countries have basic economy. So, that the government d...
^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...veloping countries have basic economy. So, that the government doesnt have enough money...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 323, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... basic economy. So, that the government doesnt have enough money to buy the drugs on l...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 328.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92073170732 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60282302239 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503048780488 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 491.4 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0092584656 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.875 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218242823405 0.272083759551 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602746396387 0.0996497079465 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647472254387 0.0662205650399 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116272164277 0.162205337803 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.098254716065 0.0443174109184 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.