Ansel adams photographs
Based on the provided materials, the discussion is about some photographs that were founded at a private home in California. The author states that according to evidence, those pictures are attributed to Ansel Adams, a landscape photographer. Then, he proposes some viable reasons concerning this theory, whereas the lecturer provides some counterarguments to repudiate this thesis entirely.
Initially, the article's writer claims that a large pine tree has been seen in those photographs, which was the same as one of Adam's photos. On the contrary, the speaker finds this reason futile since that subject was in a famous park of California that had ample of viewers. Thus, the other photographers might have taken pictures from that.
Second, the author proposes that the existence of handwriting which is presumably attributed to Adams' wife, Virginia Adams, is crucial evidence that confirms that those photographs were taken by him. Despite what the reading mentioned, the lecturer has an opposing point of view and trusts that Adams' wife did not spell some words which were written on envelopes correctly. In particular, she misspelled the name of her childhood place. Thus, this can not be a vital reason to confirm the hypothesis.
The final point on which the reading and the lecturer were at odds is that the article says some photographs were damaged by a fire incident, which plausibly happened in Adams' studio. On the other hand, the presenter questions the validity of this statement and draws attention to the point that those chemical compounds, which were used for photographs, were flammable. Thus, that was not unusual for photographers at that time to have their photographs get fire.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 16, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'articles'' or 'article's'?
Suggestion: articles'; article's
... this thesis entirely. Initially, the articles writer claims that a large pine tree ha...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, then, thus, whereas, in particular, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 274.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22627737226 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80806629086 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565693430657 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.208813422 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.153846154 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225418890555 0.272083759551 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072447022986 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649864183921 0.0662205650399 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125970472695 0.162205337803 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230515713608 0.0443174109184 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.