Broccoli cultivation
Based on the provided materials, the discussion is about the cultivation of broccoli. This vegetable can only grow in some cool areas. The author states that scientists are attempting to cultivate it on East Coast, which has hot summer. Then, he proposes some viable points of view concerning this theory, whereas the lecturer provides some counterarguments to repudiate this thesis entirely.
Initially, the article's writer claims that this effort can diminish the broccoli price due to lowering transportation costs. Since broccoli does not cultivate on East Coast, it must ship 4000 kilometers to reach there. On the contrary, the speaker finds this reason futile since the new broccoli, cultivated in temperate climates, has less yield. Therefore, farms will have less broccoli per hectare. In this way, the lower achieved money will cancel the transportation costs.
Second, the author proposes that new genetically modified crops like broccoli are more delightful than the old ones. In this process, scientists endeavor to create new broccoli resistant to hot summer. Despite what the reading mentioned, the lecturer has an opposing point of view and trusts that people are still suspicious of these crops. According to a rejection made by people to some of the crops which an American company made, new broccoli will be rejected probably.
The final point on which the reading and the lecturer were at odds is that the article says if the distance factor eliminates, broccolis will have more nutrients. The less distance, the more nutrients will save. Thus, they are healthier to consume. On the other hand, the presenter questions the validity of this statement and draws attention to the point that some other vegetables might have more vitamins and nutrients than broccoli. Hence, there is no necessity to waste money on this project. In addition, she considered educating people to eat local vegetables has more advantages than investing money in producing new broccoli.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 16, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'articles'' or 'article's'?
Suggestion: articles'; article's
...e this thesis entirely. Initially, the articles writer claims that this effort can dimi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ording to a rejection made by people to some of the crops which an American company made, n...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, second, so, still, then, therefore, thus, whereas, in addition, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 315.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30158730159 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71261249829 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565079365079 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 2.5761589404 311% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.328618113 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8947368421 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5789473684 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73684210526 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325253251209 0.272083759551 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106236876694 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113385164516 0.0662205650399 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201207819607 0.162205337803 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0845190752283 0.0443174109184 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.