the argument on the accuracy of Chevalier de Seingalt memoir. summarize the points made on the lecture and the reading and how the professor refutes the reading claims.
The lecture and the reading both discuss the accuracy of Chevalier de Seingalt memoir. While the reading states that the memoir was not accurate and he added a lot of false events to makes himself fascinating, the lecture refutes this, saying that no memoir was hundred percent correct, but Chevaliers was pretty accurate.
First of all, the reading claims that chevaliers not reach, he took the loan from a Swiss merchant. The lecture counters this point by stating that he is wealthy, but his money is in the form of property. Furthermore, the professor argues that once he ran out of cash, he borrows money from the merchant until he converts his property into cash.
In addition, the passage makes an argument that the conversation between himself and the famous writer Voltaire was inaccurate in his memoir. The lecture counters this point by stating he wrote down everything after each conversation. According to the professor, He used all his reference notes and journals while writing a memoir.
Lastly, the reading passage argues that he bribed the jail officials to escape from the prism rather escape from the jail ceiling. The lecture refutes this claim by pointing out that other prisoners are more powerful than him and he escaped from the top of the jail room. Moreover, the professor says the vanes government documents mentioned the jail room was repaired after he escapes from jail.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 263, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...refutes this, saying that no memoir was hundred percent correct, but Chevaliers was pre...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 305, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'vanes'' or 'vane's'?
Suggestion: vanes'; vane's
... room. Moreover, the professor says the vanes government documents mentioned the jail...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, lastly, moreover, so, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1170.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 234.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48400537615 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551282051282 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7571138185 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.363636364 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2727272727 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238337703062 0.272083759551 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1135101283 0.0996497079465 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120681742242 0.0662205650399 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156492060884 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0999690926703 0.0443174109184 226% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.