The article and the lecture are both discussing about the decline in frogs population. The reading claims that this phenomenon could be prevented, and explains three method for it. The professor dismisses all methods by saying that none of methods could practically work and each of problems will remain either.
First of all, the article posits that some strict regulation on using pesticide could solve the problem. The lecturer refutes this point by saying that this method is not practical and economically fair. She describes that strict regulations could contribute to sever disadvantages and cause lower yield in farms.
Secondly, while the reading asserts protecting frogs from fungus could survive them, the professor makes some arguments which contradicts this claim. She explains this method requires to be used for frogs individually, and it is so impossible to operate in large scales. Besides this treatment just can work for living frogs, so it should be continued for the next generation and offsprings of frogs. She believes using this method constantly is very expensive.
Lastly, the reading claims that frogs' habitat protection is one way to save them. The professor disagrees with this point by saying that the main cause of frogs' habitat threaten is global warming. She supports her state bay saying that prohibition of human use of water could not work to solve this problem at all.
The article and the lecture are both discussing about the decline in frogs population. The reading claims that this phenomenon could be prevented, and explains three method for it. The professor dismisses all methods by saying that none of methods could practically work and each of problems will remain either.
First of all, the article posits that some strict regulation on using pesticide could solve the problem. The lecturer refutes this point by saying that this method is not practical and economically fair. She describes that strict regulations could contribute to sever disadvantages and cause lower yield in farms.
Secondly, while the reading asserts protecting frogs from fungus could survive them, the professor makes some arguments which contradicts this claim. She explains this method requires to be used for frogs individually, and it is so impossible to operate in large scales. Besides this treatment just can work for living frogs, so it should be continued for the next generation and offsprings of frogs. She believes using this method constantly is very expensive.
Lastly, the reading claims that frogs' habitat protection is one way to save them. The professor disagrees with this point by saying that the main cause of frogs' habitat threaten is global warming. She supports her state bay saying that prohibition of human use of water could not work to solve this problem at all.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nted, and explains three method for it. The professor dismisses all methods by sayi...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'but', 'first', 'lastly', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'while', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.222672064777 0.261695866417 85% => OK
Verbs: 0.194331983806 0.158904122519 122% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0607287449393 0.0723426182421 84% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0526315789474 0.0435111971325 121% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0404858299595 0.0277247811725 146% => OK
Prepositions: 0.133603238866 0.128828473217 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0485829959514 0.0370669169778 131% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.58562164038 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0202429149798 0.0208969081088 97% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.117408906883 0.128158765124 92% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0364372469636 0.0158828679856 229% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00404858299595 0.0114777025283 35% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1413.0 1645.83664459 86% => OK
No of words: 227.0 271.125827815 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.22466960352 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.04852973271 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.370044052863 0.374372842146 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.273127753304 0.287516216867 95% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.185022026432 0.187439937562 99% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.140969162996 0.113142543107 125% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58562164038 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581497797357 0.539623497131 108% => OK
Word variations: 56.9536331115 53.8517498576 106% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.4615384615 21.7502111507 80% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.7949439011 49.3711431718 46% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.692307692 132.220823453 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4615384615 21.7502111507 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.692307692308 0.878197800319 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 44.7743137919 50.5018328374 89% => OK
Elegance: 1.40845070423 1.90840788429 74% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.705830244613 0.549887131256 128% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0974510815737 0.142949733639 68% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0730798854006 0.0787303798458 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.552850692611 0.631733273073 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0798273362033 0.139662658121 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.284456469027 0.266732575781 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.167754344363 0.103435571967 162% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.299224614789 0.414875509568 72% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0611715499615 0.0530846634433 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.494854701264 0.40443939384 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.240542747701 0.0528353158467 455% => Less connections among paragraphs
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.62251655629 166% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.2958057395 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.