The article discusses that there is some uncertainty that some paintings were painted by a well-known painter named Rembrandt. The focus of the article is on an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet and it claims that it was not painted by him and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor refutes all claims. Describe the all opinion's professor.
The article discusses that there is some uncertainty that some paintings were painted by a well-known painter named Rembrandt. The focus of the article is on an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet and it claims that it was not painted by him and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor refutes all claims.
First, the report develops the idea that there is inconsistency attributed to the way the woman is dressed. In contrast, the professor rejects the point. He points out that many examinations like X-ray and other measurements were taken and they found that fur collar was placed after painting. They did so to increase the value of the painting.
Second, the reading puts forward that he was mater on painting light and shadow but they are not fitted together. Conversely, the professor disproves the contend. He states that some changes were made and they were removed from the original painting to be seen. Light collar reflects the light and face and they are not shadowing. So, These are partly realistic.
Third, the text develops the idea that it was painted on a panel that was made of several pieces of wood and they are glued together. On the other hand, the professor rules out the contention. He explains that they changed it after painting. They were added to make it large and valuable. The original painting was on a single wood but after that other pieces of wood were added to it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The article discusses that there is some...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er, the professor refutes all claims. First, the report develops the idea that...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o increase the value of the painting. Second, the reading puts forward that he...
^^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...er. Conversely, the professor disproves the contend. He states that some changes were made ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, however, second, so, third, well, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1178.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78861788618 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45435897592 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 359.1 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6698383936 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.2941176471 110.228320801 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4705882353 21.698381199 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17647058824 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386791456372 0.272083759551 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107794990026 0.0996497079465 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.190521403468 0.0662205650399 288% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273922482785 0.162205337803 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.301699987701 0.0443174109184 681% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.3589403974 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.91 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.