Some people put forward the idea that students should take history courses without considering their field, other people do no believe in the idea. Do you agree with them or not?
University is one of the determinants of our future job. Therefore, everyone must pass it as correctly as they can. Some policies have been suggested. While some people put forward the idea that students should take history courses without considering their field, other people do no believe in the idea. From my point of view, I disagree with the statement and I think this policy should not be implemented for two main reasons. In the following paragraphs, I am going to explore them.
The first reason behind my decision is that students should be provided with various programs instead of taking a history class. Students have many courses when they are studying. So, it is not a good idea to add another course to their curriculum. Instead of history class, they can take some other programs like a club, play games, go to travel and so on. Various programs in which class is not part of them can lead to a different atmosphere. Students can experience different situations along with their friends. If students go to different places and experience many situations, they will get better scores. Thus, they will be more successful and eventually good outcomes will be generated.
Another reason is that I strongly believe that there are many more important courses rather than history. There are some vital skills including decision-making, management, business and so forth which are necessary for everyone to learn them. It is axiomatic that if people do not perform the aforementioned skills in their personal life, they may have so troubles which avert their successful path. So, students should learn such skills, not history. When they perceive such skills, they can make proper decisions, manage their family and even their money and so on. Moreover, they may be a canny businessman due to the learning business. Hence, students should take these classes.
Finally, taking a history course is a waste of time. We live in the age of technology which accelerates the competition among different parts of our life. So, invest in history has nothing and universities should concentrate on practical matters. The reason for this is that it takes students a long time and the university also invests in an abortive plan. In other words, they can focus on better education on health. By doing so, people may have a better lifestyle and even longer life. When people have a better lifestyle, they may be able to work better and this results in more wealth at the national level.
In conclusion, the university plays a pivotal role in achieving our goals and it should be passed properly. I contend that universities should focus on their courses rather than history because not only better are different programs, but also there are many more important courses and above all, it is a waste of money and time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ragraphs, I am going to explore them. The first reason behind my decision is t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ally good outcomes will be generated. Another reason is that I strongly believ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., students should take these classes. Finally, taking a history course is a wa...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in more wealth at the national level. In conclusion, the university plays a pi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, i think, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 10.4613686534 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 5.04856512141 436% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 22.412803532 223% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2348.0 1373.03311258 171% => OK
No of words: 473.0 270.72406181 175% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96405919662 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.04702891845 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64264185968 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 145.348785872 156% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479915433404 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 733.5 419.366225166 175% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 3.25607064018 461% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 13.0662251656 230% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3207831714 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.2666666667 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7666666667 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.96666666667 7.06452816374 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 4.33554083885 254% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.27373068433 304% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339638038127 0.272083759551 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880962746477 0.0996497079465 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145200380371 0.0662205650399 219% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207529583483 0.162205337803 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13833757667 0.0443174109184 312% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 63.6247240618 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.