The reading holds the point of view that asteroids are identical colonization and gives out three reasons. However, the listening holds the contrary view that asteroids also have downsides and argues against three reasons one by one.
Firstly, the reading points out that asteroids have low gravity, which can bring a safer landing. We can carry more equipment and less fuel to return. But the listening refutes against it by saying that low gravity may result in health risks such as losing muscle and bone density. The listening gives out an example saying that astronauts who stay on a spaceship for a few months may suffer from losing muscle and bone density, so living on an asteroid for a long time will surely bring great health risk. Because of this, Asteroids are not identical colonization.
Secondly, the reading thinks that some asteroids are rich in rare materials on earth, which will make it profitable to mine minerals and send them back to sell. However, the listening says that transportation and keeping the mining equipment working properly might be a great cost. What's more, selling the minerals in large quantities may lower the market price. In a nutshell, mining on asteroids is not profitable.
Thirdly, the reading says that some asteroids are easy to reach, which makes them much easier and more affordable to get to and get back. But the listening argues against it by saying that asteroids have an unusual orbit. They may move away from earth for a great distance rather than stay close to earth. In that point of view, asteroids are not identical colonization.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...working properly might be a great cost. Whats more, selling the minerals in large qua...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1334.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 268.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9776119403 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49963240782 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537313432836 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.1381090531 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.9333333333 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108781279662 0.272083759551 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454412775795 0.0996497079465 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0256592949566 0.0662205650399 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0711916860901 0.162205337803 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0101832723307 0.0443174109184 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.