bee, Arizona, fossilize, actual bees fossils, flowering plant, chambers
In this set of material, both the author and the lecturer discuss the existence of bees as early as 200 million years ago. Ancient fossil structures discovered inside fossilized trees in the state of Arizona support this hypothesis. While the author of the reading passage declares that such a theory cannot be possible, the professor explains how they are reasonable, and the author's claims do not convince her. In what follows, the reasons of the author and the professor will be discussed.
Firstly, the reading asserts that scientists have not found actual bees fossils as early as 200 million years ago. On the other hand, the professor believes they cannot be preserved.
Secondly, according to the passage, it is said that there was no flowering plant in that era. In contrast, the lecturer says it was possible for bees to live without flowering plants, and they probably feed on other trees such as non-pine trees. They could adapt themselves feeding on them.
Finally, the author of the reading proclaims that the nest chambers are approximately similar to fossilized structures found in Arizona. However, the professor explains that some of the chambers nest have chemical substances that it can distinguish them with bees.
In conclusion, the professor disagrees with claims of the author.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 175, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...a. However, the professor explains that some of the chambers nest have chemical substances ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1104.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 212.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20754716981 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64112193923 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556603773585 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5850886508 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06452816374 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167943111807 0.272083759551 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541298497805 0.0996497079465 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531781193778 0.0662205650399 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0813723650259 0.162205337803 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484565749062 0.0443174109184 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.