Chevalier's memoir
The reading passage states that the Chevalier wrote a long memoir that is a valuable historical source for European society but some of the critics have doubts about the accuracy of the memoir and provide some details for proving the points. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubts on the points made in the reading.
First, considering the article that Chevalier claims that he was very wealthy at the younger age and spent a great deal of money there on parties and gambling. But the reading claims that there is evidence that in that situation he borrowed money from a Swiss merchant. In contrast, the professor in the lecture contradicts the idea and further explains that this evidence is not mean that he was poor man and maybe he just borrows some cash before he sold some of his products.
Second, the reading passage claims that the accuracy of his conversations with famous peoples is under doubt and it's not so reliable that everything wrote very accurate after a long time. Admittedly, the professor justifies the information presented in the reading and makes the point that some witnesses give prove about accuracy of conservation and he also wrote details of conservations after meetings.
Tired, critics point out he claims the story about escaped from prison just for making the reading enjoyable. In the same way, the speaker talks about government documents that show in that event there was a hole in the ceiling and they repair it.
To sum up, both the writer and professor hold conflicting views about Chevalier's memoir. It is clear they will have trouble finding common ground on this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...torical source for European society but some of the critics have doubts about the accuracy ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, in contrast, to sum up, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1363.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95636363636 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47691089935 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530909090909 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6381876257 49.2860985944 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.909090909 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 21.698381199 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153030731263 0.272083759551 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631207532341 0.0996497079465 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114477955742 0.0662205650399 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101918889352 0.162205337803 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10795665944 0.0443174109184 244% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.