Chevalier's memoir TPO8
The reading passage and lecture have conflicting opinions about whether the notes of Chevalier life is precise. The article strongly postulates that they are highly possible to be added some decoration words and changed the original one to make-believe us that his life was more elegant and fancy. On the other hand, the listening adamantly delineates that it is actually pretty accurate and reliable resources of his life.
First and foremost, according to the author of the excerpt, although he was well-known for his wealth, he borrowed a significant amount of money from a Swiss merchant. Nonetheless, the lecture offsets these points by declaring that borrowing money from someone is not demonstrate that he was poor. Since he might have great number of properties which couldn't convert easily into cash. Furthermore, she points out that he had to borrow some money for his debt of gambling or anything because converting money took several days.
Secondly, the professor in the lecture further asserts that dialogue between chevalier and Voltaire was the real one because many witnesses confirm that he carried with him several notes and journals for many years. According to his own notes, he always wrote the main ideas of his conversation with Voltaire after their dialogue did. These claims refute the writer's implications about it is not possible that he remembered all conversations with accuracy after many years it had occurred.
The article lastly points out that it is fancy reading such story as if chevalier escaped from Venice prison for using metal to make a hole, but actually he might corrupt to release himself or his rich allies favoured him. The speaker in the lecture counters these indications by insisting that other prisons who had more potent friends than him couldn't run out from this prison. Moreover, she says that after he was released, the prison made repairment in his room, so the hole was not made by chevalier.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... according to the author of the excerpt, although he was well-known for his wealt...
^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'demonstrated'.
Suggestion: demonstrated
...hat borrowing money from someone is not demonstrate that he was poor. Since he might have g...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ne is not demonstrate that he was poor. Since he might have great number of propertie...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...t have great number of properties which couldnt convert easily into cash. Furthermore, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 347, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ns who had more potent friends than him couldnt run out from this prison. Moreover, she...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, furthermore, if, lastly, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 22.412803532 210% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 321.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09345794393 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5769322776 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 145.348785872 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579439252336 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6360655622 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.769230769 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6923076923 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0334322868371 0.272083759551 12% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0139914579812 0.0996497079465 14% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0263541695612 0.0662205650399 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0232919869657 0.162205337803 14% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0138764104939 0.0443174109184 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.