Chevalier's memoir TPO8
Both the reading and the lecture argue about the correctness of the claims which contended in Chevalier's memoir which describes his life. The reading states some critics over the Chevalier's claims. However, the lecturer challenges the opposition made by the author. She is in the opinion that the memoir is precise overall as a historical source and he wrote correctly in detail.
Firstly, the reading claims that had Chevalier been a wealthy man, he would not borrow money from a merchant. The professor challenges these specific critics by pointing that borrowing money does not indicate poorness. She argues that because it was taking time to convert the assets to money, he had to wait for preparing the money. As a result, he borrows some money from the merchant.
Secondly, the reading asserts that in spite of accepting that Chevalier discusses with renowned writer Voltaire it is impossible to admit he evokes detail descriptions of conversations that had happened many years ago. On the contrary, the lecturer mentions that Chevalier wrote everything about their conversation in detail each night. Additionally, she alleges that the witness confirmed the detail that he composed in the memoir.
Eventually, the author of the reading points that Chevalier's claim about escaping from prison, by using metal to make a hole in the ceiling, is not correct, and he just bribed the prisoners to free him. However, the professor referred to an even more powerful man who was in his prison and could not offer a bribe to jailers. Besides, she mentions that in the remained notes, it has written that soon after Chevalier run away, jail's ceiling had repaired. If he did not escape from prison, it would not be necessary to renovate the ceiling.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rce and he wrote correctly in detail. Firstly, the reading claims that had Che...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etail that he composed in the memoir. Eventually, the author of the reading po...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, as a result, in spite of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 289.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10726643599 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63646930849 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557093425606 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4364214981 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139309483017 0.272083759551 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509921816096 0.0996497079465 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463273768047 0.0662205650399 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094433805806 0.162205337803 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544660071608 0.0443174109184 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.