Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Students are a principal part of society, that their manner of thinking and behaving will affect communities in the future. The infrastructure of their induction and conduction skills will be formed in this era. It is greatly disputable whether teachers assert their points of view about various matters of politics and society. I strongly believe it is a great approach that teachers discuss their mindset. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, introducing different manners and thinking of teachers, which are the educated people, lead to strength the power of discussion and debate in society. As a matter of fact, in each discussion, there will be both agreement and disagreement about the issues. With discussion, students can learn how to oppose their teacher's opinion and assert themselves, or on the contrary, how to bring a plausible reason for their supportive views. This way of thinking will help children to be more effective in their future occasions. Thus, we improve the quality of discussion in the communities, and this progress makes us be hopeful to have rational groups in the future.
Secondly, forbidding teachers from alleging their idea, causes students to think like what they see in the TVs and news. In this way, we grow up individuals who do not think about problems deeply and agree with the words of limited people who have power in society. Teachers' responsibility is to learn students go through the problems and be skeptical about issues. My experience is a compelling example of this idea. When I was a student, it was the law of school that our teachers were not allowed to refer to their opinions in the classrooms. Thus, the only source to discuss the problems which were prevalent in our city was home with friends and family. We did look at the problems superficially and agreed with the assertions of the city's mayor, which displayed on the TV. After two years, the law was changed, and the teachers argued about the city's problems in the classrooms and said their opinions. As a result, we learn to defend our rights correctly and to oppose TV programs' ideas.
In sum, I strongly believe the students benefit from teachers' opinions. In fact, they can learn not only how to argue about a dilemma but also reject shallow thoughts discussing in the TV news.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will explore in the following essay. To begin with, introducing different man...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... have rational groups in the future. Secondly, forbidding teachers from alleg...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, thus, i feel, in fact, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1972.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91770573566 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68017275084 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503740648379 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1034497537 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9047619048 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0952380952 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197145514898 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581395933524 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410889436891 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112081298927 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396020514649 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.