colonization on asteroids
The reading and the lecture are both about potential benefits to colonizing astroids. While the author of the article argues that the colonizing astroids have three potential benefits that make the pursuit of astroid colonization a worthwhile endeover, the lecturer disputes the claims mentioned in the artile. His position is that those benefits are not supported by evidane and the colonization is not going to provide any advantages.
According to the reading, one of the most obvious benefits is the scientific potential. The article mentions that astroids provide a unique environment for scientific research de to their small size, low gravity, and lack of atmosphere. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that there is a lack of knowledge and having insignificant information make it hard to get scientific benefit from the idea of colonizing astroids.
Secondly, the author says that there is a potential economic growth and development. The author notes that natural resources mined in astroids could create new industries and job opportunities. However, the lecturer asserts that people can not predict how much resources are exist on those astroids. He goes on to say that not knowing the quantity will make not clear if there will be a real economic benefit or not.
Finally, the author puts forth the idea that there is an important implications for the long term survival of humanity. The author contents that they are going to serve as a refuge for humans in the event of large scale disaster on Earth. In contrast, the lecturer states that most astroids are small without enough mas, which make the gravity on it not enough for humans living. He says that any try to live there needs to be desiged to cope with the low gravity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...asserts that people can not predict how much resources are exist on those astroids. ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
... can not predict how much resources are exist on those astroids. He goes on to say th...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 54, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...author puts forth the idea that there is an important implications for the long t...
^^
Line 4, column 69, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'implication'?
Suggestion: implication
...th the idea that there is an important implications for the long term survival of humanity....
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 293.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02389078498 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72830979884 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522184300341 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.218845776 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1333333333 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13333333333 7.06452816374 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107562606937 0.272083759551 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0369662363032 0.0996497079465 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626611053345 0.0662205650399 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0690398722322 0.162205337803 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.090253060748 0.0443174109184 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.