colonization on asteroids
The reading and the lecture are both about potential benefits to colonizing astroids. While the author of the article claims three benefits, the lecturer disputs the claims mentioned in the article. His position is that those benefits are not supported byevidence.
To begin with, according to the reading, one of the most obvious benefits is the scientific potential. The article mentions that astroids provide a uique environment for scientific reaserch. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that people lack the knowledge about astroids. Additionally, he points out that due to limited informatio, it will be very difficult to predict any thing about them.
Second, the author says that a potential economic growth and development is one of the benefits of asteroids colonization. The author notes that natural resources mined on asteroids could create new industries and job opportunities, and it could reduce the need for resources extraction on earth. However, the lecturer asserts that, it is not clear how much mined are existed on asteroids. He goes on to say that it is also not clear if after transporting them, the quantity will be worth it or not.
Finally, the author puts forth the idea that astroids could have important implications for long term survival of humanity. The author contends that they could serve as a potential refuge for humans in case of disaster. In contrast, the lecturer states that most of asteroids are not suitable for human's living. He says that they have a low gravity, which make living there is extremely dangerous.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 146, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... article mentions that astroids provide a uique environment for scientific reaser...
^
Line 2, column 390, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anything'?
Suggestion: anything
...o, it will be very difficult to predict any thing about them. Second, the author says th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 258, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the asteroids') or simply say ''most asteroids''.
Suggestion: most of the asteroids; most asteroids
.... In contrast, the lecturer states that most of asteroids are not suitable for humans living. He ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, second, so, while, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 257.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15175097276 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78598678347 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56420233463 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4490423231 49.2860985944 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.75 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0625 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5625 7.06452816374 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113377430259 0.272083759551 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0316371714824 0.0996497079465 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561305839775 0.0662205650399 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0573961363539 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375269474111 0.0443174109184 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.